BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24027111)

  • 1. The use of pharmacometrics to optimize biosimilar development.
    Dodds M; Chow V; Markus R; Pérez-Ruixo JJ; Shen D; Gibbs M
    J Pharm Sci; 2013 Nov; 102(11):3908-14. PubMed ID: 24027111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of Modeling and Simulation in the Development of Novel and Biosimilar Therapeutic Proteins.
    Wang YC; Wang Y; Schrieber SJ; Earp J; Thway TM; Huang SM; Zineh I; Christl L
    J Pharm Sci; 2019 Jan; 108(1):73-77. PubMed ID: 30395832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biosimilar monoclonal antibodies: preclinical and clinical development aspects.
    Gonçalves J; Araújo F; Cutolo M; Fonseca JE
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2016; 34(4):698-705. PubMed ID: 27383278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical development and trial design of biosimilar products: a Japanese perspective.
    Nagasaki M; Ando Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(6):1165-72. PubMed ID: 25033370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Considerations in the early development of biosimilar products.
    Li EC; Abbas R; Jacobs IA; Yin D
    Drug Discov Today; 2015 May; 20 Suppl 2():1-9. PubMed ID: 25572407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the power to establish clinical similarity in a Phase 3 efficacy trial by incorporating prior evidence of analytical and pharmacokinetic similarity.
    Zeng D; Pan J; Hu K; Chi E; Lin DY
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(2):320-332. PubMed ID: 29173074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of Pharmacometric Analysis in the Design of Clinical Pharmacology Studies for Biosimilar Development.
    Zhu P; Sy SKB; Skerjanec A
    AAPS J; 2018 Mar; 20(2):40. PubMed ID: 29516330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Challenges of developing and validating immunogenicity assays to support comparability studies for biosimilar drug development.
    Cai XY; Thomas J; Cullen C; Gouty D
    Bioanalysis; 2012 Sep; 4(17):2169-77. PubMed ID: 23013399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using Clinical PK/PD Studies to Support No Clinically Meaningful Differences Between a Proposed Biosimilar and the Reference Product.
    Zhu P; Ji P; Wang Y
    AAPS J; 2018 Aug; 20(5):89. PubMed ID: 30094524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bioanalytical strategy used in development of pharmacokinetic (PK) methods that support biosimilar programs.
    Colbert A; Umble-Romero A; Prokop S; Chow VF; Wong T; DeSimone D; Zhou L; Pederson S
    MAbs; 2014; 6(5):1178-89. PubMed ID: 25517303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scientific factors and current issues in biosimilar studies.
    Chow SC; Endrenyi L; Lachenbruch PA; Mentré F
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(6):1138-53. PubMed ID: 25098559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparability of biosimilar filgrastim with originator filgrastim: protein characterization, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics.
    Sörgel F; Schwebig A; Holzmann J; Prasch S; Singh P; Kinzig M
    BioDrugs; 2015 Apr; 29(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 25837839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Opportunities and challenges of extrapolation for biosimilars].
    Weise M; Wolff-Holz E
    Z Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 54(11):1211-1216. PubMed ID: 27711947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Parameters in EU- Versus US-Licensed Reference Biological Products: Are In Vivo Bridging Studies Justified for Biosimilar Development?
    Tu CL; Wang YL; Hu TM; Hsu LF
    BioDrugs; 2019 Aug; 33(4):437-446. PubMed ID: 31111423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The first biosimilar approved for the treatment of osteoporosis: results of a comparative pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study.
    Takács I; Jókai E; Kováts DE; Aradi I
    Osteoporos Int; 2019 Mar; 30(3):675-683. PubMed ID: 30357438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differentiating biosimilarity and comparability in biotherapeutics.
    Azevedo V; Hassett B; Fonseca JE; Atsumi T; Coindreau J; Jacobs I; Mahgoub E; O'Brien J; Singh E; Vicik S; Fitzpatrick B
    Clin Rheumatol; 2016 Dec; 35(12):2877-2886. PubMed ID: 27734233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Market entry of biosimilar low-molecular-weight heparins in Europe: opportunities and challenges.
    Simoens S; Huys I
    Semin Thromb Hemost; 2013 Apr; 39(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 23235959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analytic characterization of biosimilars.
    Sullivan PM; DiGrazia LM
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2017 Apr; 74(8):568-579. PubMed ID: 28389456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pharmacology of biosimilar candidate drugs in rheumatology: a literature review.
    Araújo F; Cordeiro I; Teixeira F; Gonçalves J; Fonseca JE
    Acta Reumatol Port; 2014; 39(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 24811458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparability and biosimilarity: considerations for the healthcare provider.
    Lee JF; Litten JB; Grampp G
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Jun; 28(6):1053-8. PubMed ID: 22519391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.