177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24027140)
1. Validation of claims-based algorithms for identification of high-grade cervical dysplasia and cervical cancer.
Kim SC; Gillet VG; Feldman S; Lii H; Toh S; Brown JS; Katz JN; Solomon DH; Schneeweiss S
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2013 Nov; 22(11):1239-44. PubMed ID: 24027140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving Cervical Precancer Surveillance: Validity of Claims-Based Prediction Models in ICD-9 and ICD-10 Eras.
Shing JZ; Griffin MR; Nguyen LD; Slaughter JC; Mitchel EF; Pemmaraju M; Rentuza AB; Hull PC
JNCI Cancer Spectr; 2021 Feb; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 33554035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How predictive is a cervical smear suggesting glandular neoplasia?
Mathers ME; Johnson SJ; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 2002 Apr; 13(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 11952746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Colposcopic acetowhitening of vulvar lesion: a validity study.
Santoso JT; Likes W
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Aug; 292(2):387-90. PubMed ID: 25697926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cytologic features of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions involving endocervical glands on thin-layer cytology.
Selvaggi SM
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(6):689-90. PubMed ID: 16450913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Results of prospective cytological diagnoses of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Saks A; Kodric T; Novak S; Vlaisavljević V
Jugosl Ginekol Opstet; 1983; 23(5-6):103-6. PubMed ID: 6678996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening.
van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP; Gaillard HL; Go DM
Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3604538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Pathologic diagnosis of the endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia].
Hui YZ
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 37(4):228-30. PubMed ID: 18844030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Benefit and burden in the Dutch cytology-based vs high-risk human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening program.
Loopik DL; Koenjer LM; Siebers AG; Melchers WJG; Bekkers RLM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):200.e1-200.e9. PubMed ID: 32800820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial: human papillomavirus, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results from the baseline and 1-year follow-up phase.
Safaeian M; Wright TC; Stoler MH; Ranger-Moore J; Rehm S; Aslam S; Fang Q; Volkir P; Ridder R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 225(3):278.e1-278.e16. PubMed ID: 33852886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as determined by cytology and colposcopic biopsy.
Bamford PN; Beilby JO; Steele SJ; Vlies R
Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(5):482-4. PubMed ID: 6578644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A systematic review of validated methods for identifying patients with rheumatoid arthritis using administrative or claims data.
Chung CP; Rohan P; Krishnaswami S; McPheeters ML
Vaccine; 2013 Dec; 31 Suppl 10():K41-61. PubMed ID: 24331074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chart validation of inpatient ICD-9-CM administrative diagnosis codes for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) among intravenous immune globulin (IGIV) users in the Sentinel Distributed Database.
Ammann EM; Schweizer ML; Robinson JG; Eschol JO; Kafa R; Girotra S; Winiecki SK; Fuller CC; Carnahan RM; Leonard CE; Haskins C; Garcia C; Chrischilles EA
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2018 Apr; 27(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 29446185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical importance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H)" terminology for cervical smears 5-year analysis of the positive predictive value of LSIL-H compared with ASC-H, LSIL, and HSIL in the detection of high-grade cervical lesions with a review of the literature.
Ince U; Aydin O; Peker O
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Apr; 121(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 21211831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ detected by directed biopsy].
Milojković M; Makarović Z; Pajtler M
Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1989; 29(5-6):198-200. PubMed ID: 2640269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of Aptima and Cobas HPV testing platforms in detecting high-grade cervical dysplasia and cancer.
Ge Y; Christensen P; Luna E; Armylagos D; Schwartz MR; Mody DR
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Aug; 125(8):652-657. PubMed ID: 28574670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits and potential harms of human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening: A real-world comparison of HPV testing versus cytology.
Thomsen LT; Kjaer SK; Munk C; Ørnskov D; Waldstrøm M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Mar; 100(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 33566361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and adenocarcinoma in situ: comparison of ICD-9 codes and pathology results--Kaiser Permanente, United States, 2000-2005.
Surie D; Dunne EF; Naleway AL; Weinmann S; Klein NP; Baxter R; Hutchins K; Gee J; Markowitz L
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2013 Jun; 22(6):1129-32. PubMed ID: 23563889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
