These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24027203)

  • 1. A quantum question order model supported by empirical tests of an a priori and precise prediction.
    Wang Z; Busemeyer JR
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):689-710. PubMed ID: 24027203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments.
    Wang Z; Solloway T; Shiffrin RM; Busemeyer JR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jul; 111(26):9431-6. PubMed ID: 24979797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.
    Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM; Franco R; Trueblood JS
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):193-218. PubMed ID: 21480739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling?
    Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):255-74. PubMed ID: 23673021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The potential of using quantum theory to build models of cognition.
    Wang Z; Busemeyer JR; Atmanspacher H; Pothos EM
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):672-88. PubMed ID: 24027215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hilbert space multidimensional theory.
    Busemeyer JR; Wang Z
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Jul; 125(4):572-591. PubMed ID: 29952623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A quantum theory account of order effects and conjunction fallacies in political judgments.
    Yearsley JM; Trueblood JS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1517-1525. PubMed ID: 28879495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A quantum probability perspective on borderline vagueness.
    Blutner R; Pothos EM; Bruza P
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):711-36. PubMed ID: 24039093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A quantum probability account of order effects in inference.
    Trueblood JS; Busemeyer JR
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(8):1518-52. PubMed ID: 21951058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Superposition of episodic memories: overdistribution and quantum models.
    Brainerd CJ; Wang Z; Reyna VF
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):773-99. PubMed ID: 24027175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A quantum geometric model of similarity.
    Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR; Trueblood JS
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Jul; 120(3):679-96. PubMed ID: 23915087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is there a problem with quantum models of psychological measurements?
    Busemeyer J; Wang Z
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187733. PubMed ID: 29117246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantum modeling of common sense.
    Noori HR; Spanagel R
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):302. PubMed ID: 23673048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comments on quantum probability theory.
    Sloman S
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 24482328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Open parallel cooperative and competitive decision processes: a potential provenance for quantum probability decision models.
    Fuss IG; Navarro DJ
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):818-43. PubMed ID: 24019237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On quantum models of the human mind.
    Wang H; Sun Y
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 24259276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primer on quantum cognition.
    Busemeyer JR; Wang Z
    Span J Psychol; 2019 Dec; 22():E53. PubMed ID: 31868156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantum Cognition.
    Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2022 Jan; 73():749-778. PubMed ID: 34546804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surprising rationality in probability judgment: Assessing two competing models.
    Costello F; Watts P; Fisher C
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():280-297. PubMed ID: 29096329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why quantum probability does not explain the conjunction fallacy.
    Tentori K; Crupi V
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):308-10. PubMed ID: 23673055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.