These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24027381)

  • 1. Approximate and Pseudo-Likelihood Analysis for Logistic Regression Using External Validation Data to Model Log Exposure.
    Lyles RH; Kupper LL
    J Agric Biol Environ Stat; 2013 Mar; 18(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 24027381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linear mixed models for replication data to efficiently allow for covariate measurement error.
    Bartlett JW; De Stavola BL; Frost C
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(25):3158-78. PubMed ID: 19777493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maximum likelihood, multiple imputation and regression calibration for measurement error adjustment.
    Messer K; Natarajan L
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(30):6332-50. PubMed ID: 18937275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Approximate maximum likelihood estimation for logistic regression with covariate measurement error.
    Cao Z; Wong MY
    Biom J; 2021 Jan; 63(1):27-45. PubMed ID: 32914478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Segmented regression with errors in predictors: semi-parametric and parametric methods.
    Küchenhoff H; Carroll RJ
    Stat Med; 1997 Jan 15-Feb 15; 16(1-3):169-88. PubMed ID: 9004390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fully parametric and semi-parametric regression models for common events with covariate measurement error in main study/validation study designs.
    Spiegelman D; Casella M
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):395-409. PubMed ID: 9192443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the potential of measurement error to induce differential bias on odds ratio estimates: an example from radon epidemiology.
    Heid IM; Küchenhoff H; Wellmann J; Gerken M; Kreienbrock L; Wichmann HE
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3261-78. PubMed ID: 12375303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A detailed evaluation of adjustment methods for multiplicative measurement error in linear regression with applications in occupational epidemiology.
    Lyles RH; Kupper LL
    Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):1008-25. PubMed ID: 9290228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simulation study of measurement error correction methods in logistic regression.
    Thoresen M; Laake P
    Biometrics; 2000 Sep; 56(3):868-72. PubMed ID: 10985228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some aspects of measurement error in explanatory variables for continuous and binary regression models.
    Reeves GK; Cox DR; Darby SC; Whitley E
    Stat Med; 1998 Oct; 17(19):2157-77. PubMed ID: 9802176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unified Analysis of Secondary Traits in Case-Control Association Studies.
    Ghosh A; Wright FA; Zou F
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2013; 108(502):. PubMed ID: 24409003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic review of statistical approaches to quantify, or correct for, measurement error in a continuous exposure in nutritional epidemiology.
    Bennett DA; Landry D; Little J; Minelli C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):146. PubMed ID: 28927376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling gene expression measurement error: a quasi-likelihood approach.
    Strimmer K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2003 Mar; 4():10. PubMed ID: 12659637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement error adjustment in essential fatty acid intake from a food frequency questionnaire: alternative approaches and methods.
    Beydoun MA; Kaufman JS; Ibrahim J; Satia JA; Heiss G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Sep; 7():41. PubMed ID: 17868465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Logistic regression with a continuous exposure measured in pools and subject to errors.
    Van Domelen DR; Mitchell EM; Perkins NJ; Schisterman EF; Manatunga AK; Huang Y; Lyles RH
    Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(27):4007-4021. PubMed ID: 30022497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for systematic within-person measurement error.
    Rosner B; Willett WC; Spiegelman D
    Stat Med; 1989 Sep; 8(9):1051-69; discussion 1071-3. PubMed ID: 2799131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional and Structural Methods with Mixed Measurement Error and Misclassification in Covariates.
    Yi GY; Ma Y; Spiegelman D; Carroll RJ
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2015 Jun; 110(510):681-696. PubMed ID: 26190876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of regression calibration and SIMEX methods in logistic regression when one of the predictors is subject to additive measurement error.
    Fung KY; Krewski D
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 1999; 4(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 10619053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement error correction for logistic regression models with an "alloyed gold standard".
    Spiegelman D; Schneeweiss S; McDermott A
    Am J Epidemiol; 1997 Jan; 145(2):184-96. PubMed ID: 9006315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.