These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24027550)

  • 1. Congruency sequence effects are driven by previous-trial congruency, not previous-trial response conflict.
    Weissman DH; Carp J
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():587. PubMed ID: 24027550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Event-related potential indices of congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds.
    Larson MJ; Clayson PE; Kirwan CB; Weissman DH
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jun; 53(6):814-22. PubMed ID: 26854028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Going, going, gone: characterizing the time-course of congruency sequence effects.
    Egner T; Ely S; Grinband J
    Front Psychol; 2010; 1():154. PubMed ID: 21833220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The congruency effect in the posterior medial frontal cortex is more consistent with time on task than with response conflict.
    Weissman DH; Carp J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e62405. PubMed ID: 23638070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds.
    Schmidt JR; Weissman DH
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e102337. PubMed ID: 25019526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interacting congruency effects in the hybrid Stroop-Simon task prevent conclusions regarding the domain specificity or generality of the congruency sequence effect.
    Weissman DH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):945-967. PubMed ID: 31580121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds.
    Weissman DH; Jiang J; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):2022-2037. PubMed ID: 25089574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive control during a spatial Stroop task: Comparing conflict monitoring and prediction of response-outcome theories.
    Pires L; Leitão J; Guerrini C; Simões MR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():63-75. PubMed ID: 28683927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A diffusion model for the congruency sequence effect.
    Luo C; Proctor RW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Dec; 29(6):2034-2051. PubMed ID: 35676612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conflict-monitoring theory in overtime: Is temporal learning a viable explanation for the congruency sequence effect?
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 May; 48(5):497-530. PubMed ID: 35389710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Further Evidence for the Binding and Retrieval of Control-States From the Flanker Task.
    Dignath D; Kiesel A
    Exp Psychol; 2021 Sep; 68(5):264-273. PubMed ID: 34911358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No temporal decay of cognitive control in the congruency sequence effect.
    Schiltenwolf M; Kiesel A; Dignath D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1247-1263. PubMed ID: 36066855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contingent attentional capture triggers the congruency sequence effect.
    Schmidt JR; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():61-8. PubMed ID: 26036421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The heterogeneous world of congruency sequence effects: an update.
    Duthoo W; Abrahamse EL; Braem S; Boehler CN; Notebaert W
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1001. PubMed ID: 25250005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finding an interaction between Stroop congruency and flanker congruency requires a large congruency effect: A within-trial combination of conflict tasks.
    Rey-Mermet A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2271-2301. PubMed ID: 31974936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information in congruency sequence effects: Applying the diffusion model for conflict tasks.
    Koob V; Mackenzie I; Ulrich R; Leuthold H; Janczyk M
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Feb; 140():101528. PubMed ID: 36584549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adjustments of selective attention to response conflict - controlling for perceptual conflict, target-distractor identity, and congruency level sequence pertaining to the congruency sequence effect.
    Tomat M; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2531-2550. PubMed ID: 33948882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptation to emotional conflict: evidence from a novel face emotion paradigm.
    Clayson PE; Larson MJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75776. PubMed ID: 24073278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Registered Replication Report of Weissman, D. H., Jiang, J., & Egner, T. (2014). Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds.
    Gyurkovics M; Kovacs M; Jaquiery M; Palfi B; Dechterenko F; Aczel B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3777-3787. PubMed ID: 32935289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An attentional mechanism for minimizing cross-modal distraction.
    Grant LD; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar; 174():9-16. PubMed ID: 28126490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.