255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24028432)
1. Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants.
Phillips PL; Yang Q; Davis S; Sampson EM; Azeke JI; Hamad A; Schultz GS
Int Wound J; 2015 Aug; 12(4):469-83. PubMed ID: 24028432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cadexomer iodine effectively reduces bacterial biofilm in porcine wounds ex vivo and in vivo.
Roche ED; Woodmansey EJ; Yang Q; Gibson DJ; Zhang H; Schultz GS
Int Wound J; 2019 Jun; 16(3):674-683. PubMed ID: 30868761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of negative pressure wound therapy with periodic instillation using antimicrobial solutions on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants.
Phillips PL; Yang Q; Schultz GS
Int Wound J; 2013 Dec; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):48-55. PubMed ID: 24251844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cadexomer iodine provides superior efficacy against bacterial wound biofilms in vitro and in vivo.
Fitzgerald DJ; Renick PJ; Forrest EC; Tetens SP; Earnest DN; McMillan J; Kiedaisch BM; Shi L; Roche ED
Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Jan; 25(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 27859922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A surfactant-based wound dressing can reduce bacterial biofilms in a porcine skin explant model.
Yang Q; Larose C; Della Porta AC; Schultz GS; Gibson DJ
Int Wound J; 2017 Apr; 14(2):408-413. PubMed ID: 27212453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of internally validated
Suleman L; Purcell L; Thomas H; Westgate S
J Wound Care; 2020 Mar; 29(3):154-161. PubMed ID: 32160088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and in vitro performance of an antibiofilm Hydrofiber wound dressing.
Scully R; Hurlow J; Walker M; Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler P
J Wound Care; 2018 Sep; 27(9):584-592. PubMed ID: 30204577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro prevention and inactivation of biofilms using controlled-release iodine foam dressings for wound healing.
Watson F; Chen R; Percival SL
Int Wound J; 2024 Jan; 21(1):e14365. PubMed ID: 37715349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development, characterization, and evaluation of a simple polymicrobial colony biofilm model for testing of antimicrobial wound dressings.
Robertson SN; Romero M; Fenn S; Kohler Riedi PL; Cámara M
J Appl Microbiol; 2024 Mar; 135(3):. PubMed ID: 38366933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Antimicrobial dressings: Comparison of the ability of a panel of dressings to prevent biofilm formation by key burn wound pathogens.
Halstead FD; Rauf M; Bamford A; Wearn CM; Bishop JRB; Burt R; Fraise AP; Moiemen NS; Oppenheim BA; Webber MA
Burns; 2015 Dec; 41(8):1683-1694. PubMed ID: 26188884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of various wound dressings on microbial growth in perfused equine musculocutaneous flaps.
De Clercq E; Den Hondt S; De Baere C; Martens AM
Am J Vet Res; 2021 Mar; 82(3):189-197. PubMed ID: 33629894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of biofilm-targeted antimicrobial wound dressing for the treatment of chronic wound infections.
Ng SF; Leow HL
Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2015; 41(11):1902-9. PubMed ID: 25758412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of short exposure times of antimicrobial wound solutions against microbial biofilms: from in vitro to in vivo.
Johani K; Malone M; Jensen SO; Dickson HG; Gosbell IB; Hu H; Yang Q; Schultz G; Vickery K
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2018 Feb; 73(2):494-502. PubMed ID: 29165561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Controlled-release iodine foam dressings demonstrate broad-spectrum biofilm management in several in vitro models.
Salisbury AM; Mullin M; Foulkes L; Chen R; Percival SL
Int Wound J; 2022 Nov; 19(7):1717-1728. PubMed ID: 35166016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model.
Seth AK; Zhong A; Nguyen KT; Hong SJ; Leung KP; Galiano RD; Mustoe TA
Wound Repair Regen; 2014; 22(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 25230854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Antibiofilm activity of chitosan/epsilon-poly-L-lysine hydrogels in a porcine ex vivo skin wound polymicrobial biofilm model.
Pati BA; Kurata WE; Horseman TS; Pierce LM
Wound Repair Regen; 2021 Mar; 29(2):316-326. PubMed ID: 33480137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anti-biofilm and cytotoxicity activity of impregnated dressings with silver nanoparticles.
Velázquez-Velázquez JL; Santos-Flores A; Araujo-Meléndez J; Sánchez-Sánchez R; Velasquillo C; González C; Martínez-Castañon G; Martinez-Gutierrez F
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2015 Apr; 49():604-611. PubMed ID: 25686989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ag5IO6: novel antibiofilm activity of a silver compound with application to medical devices.
Incani V; Omar A; Prosperi-Porta G; Nadworny P
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2015 Jun; 45(6):586-93. PubMed ID: 25604278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Efficacy of Tetrasodium EDTA on Biofilms.
Percival SL; Salisbury AM
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1057():101-110. PubMed ID: 29280095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of superabsorbent dressings in a 3D acellular tissue model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm.
Larkö E; Persson A; Blom K
J Wound Care; 2015 May; 24(5):204, 206-10. PubMed ID: 25970757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
