These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
11. Relationship between coronary artery disease and epicardial adipose tissue quantification at cardiac CT: comparison between automatic volumetric measurement and manual bidimensional estimation. Bastarrika G; Broncano J; Schoepf UJ; Schwarz F; Lee YS; Abro JA; Costello P; Zwerner PL Acad Radiol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):727-34. PubMed ID: 20363161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Beam hardening correction in CT myocardial perfusion measurement. So A; Hsieh J; Li JY; Lee TY Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(10):3031-50. PubMed ID: 19398817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnosis of coronary stenosis with CT angiography comparison of automated computer diagnosis with expert readings. Halpern EJ; Halpern DJ Acad Radiol; 2011 Mar; 18(3):324-33. PubMed ID: 21215663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification of coronary arterial stenoses in CTA using fuzzy distance transform. Xu Y; Liang G; Hu G; Yang Y; Geng J; Saha PK Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2012 Jan; 36(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 21555207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT. Ho KT; Chua KC; Klotz E; Panknin C JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Aug; 3(8):811-20. PubMed ID: 20705260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the extent and severity of myocardial perfusion defects measured by CT coronary angiography and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Tamarappoo BK; Dey D; Nakazato R; Shmilovich H; Smith T; Cheng VY; Thomson LE; Hayes SW; Friedman JD; Germano G; Slomka PJ; Berman DS JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Oct; 3(10):1010-9. PubMed ID: 20947046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Standardized evaluation framework for evaluating coronary artery stenosis detection, stenosis quantification and lumen segmentation algorithms in computed tomography angiography. Kirişli HA; Schaap M; Metz CT; Dharampal AS; Meijboom WB; Papadopoulou SL; Dedic A; Nieman K; de Graaf MA; Meijs MF; Cramer MJ; Broersen A; Cetin S; Eslami A; Flórez-Valencia L; Lor KL; Matuszewski B; Melki I; Mohr B; Oksüz I; Shahzad R; Wang C; Kitslaar PH; Unal G; Katouzian A; Örkisz M; Chen CM; Precioso F; Najman L; Masood S; Ünay D; van Vliet L; Moreno R; Goldenberg R; Vuçini E; Krestin GP; Niessen WJ; van Walsum T Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):859-76. PubMed ID: 23837963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Myocardial density analysis utilizing automated myocardial defect analysis software on resting 320-detector MDCT. Troupis JM; Karge A; Seneviratne S; Nasis A; Ang EC; Ko BS; Nandurkar D; Paul E; Hilling-Smith R; Cameron J Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jun; 29(5):1121-7. PubMed ID: 23283562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of automated software-guided detection of significant coronary artery stenosis by CT angiography: comparison with invasive catheterisation. Anders K; Achenbach S; Petit I; Daniel WG; Uder M; Pflederer T Eur Radiol; 2013 May; 23(5):1218-25. PubMed ID: 23207868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]