These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24029389)

  • 21. Diagnostic accuracy of PET for recurrent glioma diagnosis: a meta-analysis.
    Nihashi T; Dahabreh IJ; Terasawa T
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2013 May; 34(5):944-50, S1-11. PubMed ID: 23124638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Meta-analysis: comparison of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and bone scintigraphy in the detection of bone metastasis in patients with lung cancer.
    Chang MC; Chen JH; Liang JA; Lin CC; Yang KT; Cheng KY; Yeh JJ; Kao CH
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):349-57. PubMed ID: 22173321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET and PET/CT in the differential diagnosis between malignant and benign pleural lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Treglia G; Sadeghi R; Annunziata S; Lococo F; Cafarotti S; Bertagna F; Prior JO; Ceriani L; Giovanella L
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 24331260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET for evaluation of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Cheng X; Li Y; Liu B; Xu Z; Bao L; Wang J
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Jul; 53(6):615-27. PubMed ID: 22734080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diagnostic performance of
    Treglia G; Pascale M; Lazzeri E; van der Bruggen W; Delgado Bolton RC; Glaudemans AWJM
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 May; 47(5):1287-1301. PubMed ID: 31729539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracies of F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Spondylodiscitis: A Meta-analysis.
    Kim SJ; Pak K; Kim K; Lee JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):E414-E422. PubMed ID: 30889146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT for predicting malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kim SJ; Lee SW
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Mar; 33(3):576-582. PubMed ID: 28994187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A meta-analysis of ¹⁸FDG-PET-CT, ¹⁸FDG-PET, MRI and bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer.
    Qu X; Huang X; Yan W; Wu L; Dai K
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):1007-15. PubMed ID: 21354739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diagnostic test accuracies of F-18 FDG PET/CT for prediction of microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.
    Kim K; Kim SJ
    Clin Imaging; 2021 Nov; 79():251-258. PubMed ID: 34157501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic accuracy of
    Kim SJ; Lee SW
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 91(1081):20170519. PubMed ID: 29099613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Diagnostic role of F-18 FDG PET/CT for preoperative lymph node staging in thyroid cancer patients; A systematic review and metaanalysis.
    Kim DH; Kim SJ
    Clin Imaging; 2020 Sep; 65():100-107. PubMed ID: 32387798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of gallium-68 somatostatin receptor and
    Liu X; Li N; Jiang T; Xu H; Ran Q; Shu Z; Wu J; Li Y; Zhou S; Zhang B
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2020; 23(2):188-200. PubMed ID: 32716410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Performance of 18F-FET versus 18F-FDG-PET for the diagnosis and grading of brain tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dunet V; Pomoni A; Hottinger A; Nicod-Lalonde M; Prior JO
    Neuro Oncol; 2016 Mar; 18(3):426-34. PubMed ID: 26243791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG-PET or PET/CT in breast cancer with suspected recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Xiao Y; Wang L; Jiang X; She W; He L; Hu G
    Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Nov; 37(11):1180-8. PubMed ID: 27428888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Direct comparison of diagnostic accuracies of F-18 FDG PET and MRI for detection of bone marrow involvement in lymphoma patients; A meta-analysis.
    Kim K; Kim SJ
    Leuk Res; 2020 Dec; 99():106475. PubMed ID: 33189988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in Detecting Local Recurrent Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 26 Individual Studies.
    Yu T; Meng N; Chi D; Zhao Y; Wang K; Luo Y
    Cell Biochem Biophys; 2015 Jun; 72(2):443-51. PubMed ID: 25737131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of F-18 FDG and C-11 methionine PET/CT for the evaluation of recurrent primary brain tumors.
    Tripathi M; Sharma R; Varshney R; Jaimini A; Jain J; Souza MM; Bal J; Pandey S; Kumar N; Mishra AK; Mondal A
    Clin Nucl Med; 2012 Feb; 37(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 22228339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. F-18 FDG PET for assessment of disease activity of large vessel vasculitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lee SW; Kim SJ; Seo Y; Jeong SY; Ahn BC; Lee J
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Feb; 26(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 30120746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnostic value of FDG-PET versus magnetic resonance imaging for detecting spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yin Y; Liu X; Yang X; Guo J; Wang Q; Chen L
    Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2323-2332. PubMed ID: 30121323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Primary Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas by 18F-FDG-PET.
    Younis MH; Abu-Hijleh HA; Aldahamsheh OO; Abualruz A; Thalib L
    Med Princ Pract; 2020; 29(5):465-472. PubMed ID: 31887730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.