154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24029574)
1. [Magnetic resonance staging accuracy for endometrial carcinoma based on different FIGO staging systems].
Zhang YL; Ding GJ; Shi L; Chen YQ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 May; 93(19):1486-9. PubMed ID: 24029574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR staging accuracy for endometrial cancer based on the new FIGO stage.
Shin KE; Park BK; Kim CK; Bae DS; Song SY; Kim B
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):818-24. PubMed ID: 21742787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Impact of 2009 FIGO staging system on the diagnostic value of preoperative MRI staging of endometrial carcinoma].
Yu XD; Ouyang H; Lin M; Zhou CW; Zhang R
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 33(9):692-6. PubMed ID: 22340052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Value of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2009) staging criteria].
Du L; Lei Y; Li D; Qiu X; Liang B
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Jun; 32(7):1048-51. PubMed ID: 22820597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for staging endometrial cancer. A prospective study of 100 cases at the Dorset Cancer Centre.
Ortashi O; Jain S; Emannuel O; Henry R; Wood A; Evans J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Apr; 137(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 17537566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging in endometrial cancer.
Tong T; Yajia G; Huaying W; Weijun P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):1113-8. PubMed ID: 21898079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The accurate staging of ovarian cancer using 3T magnetic resonance imaging--a realistic option.
Booth SJ; Turnbull LW; Poole DR; Richmond I
BJOG; 2008 Jun; 115(7):894-901. PubMed ID: 18485169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing myometrial invasion absence in endometrial carcinoma.
Suh DS; Kim JK; Kim KR; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(9):990-3. PubMed ID: 19636979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endometrial carcinoma: clinical characteristic and survival rates by the new compared to the prior FIGO staging systems.
Tangjitgamol S; Srijaipracharoen S; Manusirivithaya S; Khunnarong J; Pataradool K; Thavaramara T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 May; 96(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 23745302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: added benefits of MR imaging.
Beddy P; O'Neill AC; Yamamoto AK; Addley HC; Reinhold C; Sala E
Radiographics; 2012; 32(1):241-54. PubMed ID: 22236905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lymphadenectomy increases the prognostic value of the revised 2009 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: a multi-center study.
Kim HS; Kim HY; Park CY; Lee JM; Lee JK; Cho CH; Kim SM; Kim JW
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 38(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 22244682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings.
Kraljević Z; Visković K; Ledinsky M; Zadravec D; Grbavac I; Bilandzija M; Soljacić-Vranes H; Kuna K; Klasnić K; Krolo I
Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):561-8. PubMed ID: 23941005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The diagnostic value of multimodality MRI in endometrial carcinoma staging.
Du L; Yu Y; Wang Y; Xia J; Qiu X; Lei Y
Acta Radiol; 2017 May; 58(5):609-616. PubMed ID: 28273727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of deep endometrial invasion for patients with endometrial carcinoma.
Hwang JH; Lee NW; Lee KW; Lee JK
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Oct; 49(5):537-41. PubMed ID: 19780740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic significance and interobserver variability of histologic grading systems for endometrial carcinoma.
Scholten AN; Smit VT; Beerman H; van Putten WL; Creutzberg CL
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 14770433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New revised FIGO 2008 staging system for endometrial cancer produces better discrimination in survival compared with the 1988 staging system.
Kato T; Watari H; Endo D; Mitamura T; Odagiri T; Konno Y; Hosaka M; Kobayashi N; Todo Y; Sudo S; Takeda M; Dong P; Kaneuchi M; Kudo M; Sakuragi N
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Dec; 106(8):938-41. PubMed ID: 22740340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer lead to increased discrimination in patient outcomes?
Cooke EW; Pappas L; Gaffney DK
Cancer; 2011 Sep; 117(18):4231-7. PubMed ID: 21387282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of MR imaging for the prediction of myometrial invasion of endometrial carcinoma.
Chung HH; Kang SB; Cho JY; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim SH; Lee HP
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Mar; 104(3):654-9. PubMed ID: 17095081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of FIGO 1989 and 2009 recommendations on staging of endometrial carcinoma: pathologic analysis and cervical status in 123 consecutive cases.
Korczynski J; Jesionek-Kupnicka D; Gottwald L; Piekarski J
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2011 Jul; 30(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 21623209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
