These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24029631)

  • 1. Estimation of percentage breast tissue density: comparison between digital mammography (2D full field digital mammography) and digital breast tomosynthesis according to different BI-RADS categories.
    Tagliafico AS; Tagliafico G; Cavagnetto F; Calabrese M; Houssami N
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 86(1031):20130255. PubMed ID: 24029631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic density estimation: one-to-one comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using fully automated software.
    Tagliafico A; Tagliafico G; Astengo D; Cavagnetto F; Rosasco R; Rescinito G; Monetti F; Calabrese M
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Jun; 22(6):1265-70. PubMed ID: 22358426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency and Outcomes of BI-RADS Category 3 Assessments in Patients With a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Offit LR; Chikarmane SA; Lacson RC; Giess CS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Sep; 221(3):313-322. PubMed ID: 37095672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Significance and Application of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for the BI-RADS Classification of Breast Cancer.
    Cai SQ; Yan JX; Chen QS; Huang ML; Cai DL
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(9):4109-14. PubMed ID: 25987095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection and characterization of breast lesions in a selective diagnostic population: diagnostic accuracy study for comparison between one-view digital breast tomosynthesis and two-view full-field digital mammography.
    Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150743. PubMed ID: 27072391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization.
    Castillo-García M; Chevalier M; Garayoa J; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; García-Pinto D; Valverde J
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):802-810. PubMed ID: 28214227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R
    Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic Efficacy of Synthesized 2D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Multi-ethnic Malaysian Population.
    Mumin NA; Rahmat K; Fadzli F; Ramli MT; Westerhout CJ; Ramli N; Rozalli FI; Ng KH
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1459. PubMed ID: 30728394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterisation of microcalcification clusters on 2D digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): does DBT underestimate microcalcification clusters? Results of a multicentre study.
    Tagliafico A; Mariscotti G; Durando M; Stevanin C; Tagliafico G; Martino L; Bignotti B; Calabrese M; Houssami N
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Jan; 25(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 25163902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening Mammography Performance Metrics of 2D Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
    Chikarmane SA; Cochon LR; Khorasani R; Sahu S; Giess CS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):587-594. PubMed ID: 32966113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.
    Spangler ML; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Abrams G; Ganott MA; Hakim C; Perrin R; Chough DM; Shah R; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):320-4. PubMed ID: 21257882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
    Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between two-dimensional synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of T1 breast cancer.
    Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Hahn SY; Shin JH; Kim MJ
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Aug; 26(8):2538-46. PubMed ID: 26628063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: integration of image modalities enhances deep learning-based breast mass classification.
    Li X; Qin G; He Q; Sun L; Zeng H; He Z; Chen W; Zhen X; Zhou L
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):778-788. PubMed ID: 31691121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limited impact of adding digital breast tomosynthesis to full field digital mammography in an elevated breast cancer risk population.
    Keupers M; Woussen S; Postema S; Westerlinck H; Houbrechts K; Marshall N; Wildiers H; Cockmartin L; Bosmans H; Van Ongeval C
    Eur J Radiol; 2024 Aug; 177():111540. PubMed ID: 38852327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Outcomes for One-View Asymmetries Recalled From Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography Screening Examinations.
    Gong AJ; Nguyen DL; Lee EE; Mullen LA; Myers KS; Oluyemi E; Ambinder EB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Nov; 219(5):724-733. PubMed ID: 35703412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of full-field digital mammograms versus 2D synthesized mammograms for detection of microcalcifications on screening.
    Wahab RA; Lee SJ; Zhang B; Sobel L; Mahoney MC
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():14-19. PubMed ID: 30292258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of synthesized two-dimensional mammography and full-field digital mammography alone or in combination with digital breast tomosynthesis.
    You C; Zhang Y; Gu Y; Xiao Q; Liu G; Shen X; Yang W; Peng W
    Breast Cancer; 2020 Jan; 27(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 31302894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.