184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24029721)
1. Improved efficiency of multi-criteria IMPT treatment planning using iterative resampling of randomly placed pencil beams.
van de Water S; Kraan AC; Breedveld S; Schillemans W; Teguh DN; Kooy HM; Madden TM; Heijmen BJ; Hoogeman MS
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6969-83. PubMed ID: 24029721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.
de Jong BA; Battinelli C; Free J; Wagenaar D; Engwall E; Janssens G; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW; Both S
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 36373893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shortening delivery times of intensity modulated proton therapy by reducing proton energy layers during treatment plan optimization.
van de Water S; Kooy HM; Heijmen BJ; Hoogeman MS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jun; 92(2):460-8. PubMed ID: 25823447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose uncertainties in IMPT for oropharyngeal cancer in the presence of anatomical, range, and setup errors.
Kraan AC; van de Water S; Teguh DN; Al-Mamgani A; Madden T; Kooy HM; Heijmen BJ; Hoogeman MS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):888-96. PubMed ID: 24351409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy optimization techniques for pediatric craniopharyngiomas: a clinical case study.
Yeung D; McKenzie C; Indelicato DJ
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2014 Jan; 61(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 24000229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spot-Scanning Proton Arc (SPArc) Therapy: The First Robust and Delivery-Efficient Spot-Scanning Proton Arc Therapy.
Ding X; Li X; Zhang JM; Kabolizadeh P; Stevens C; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Dec; 96(5):1107-1116. PubMed ID: 27869083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Energy layer optimization strategies for intensity-modulated proton therapy of lung cancer patients.
Jensen MF; Hoffmann L; Petersen JBB; Møller DS; Alber M
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4355-4363. PubMed ID: 30129041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric advantages of IMPT over IMRT for laser-accelerated proton beams.
Luo W; Li J; Fourkal E; Fan J; Xu X; Chen Z; Jin L; Price R; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7151-66. PubMed ID: 19033641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is there a single spot size and grid for intensity modulated proton therapy? Simulation of head and neck, prostate and mesothelioma cases.
Widesott L; Lomax AJ; Schwarz M
Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 39(3):1298-308. PubMed ID: 22380362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shortening delivery times for intensity-modulated proton therapy by reducing the number of proton spots: an experimental verification.
van de Water S; Belosi MF; Albertini F; Winterhalter C; Weber DC; Lomax AJ
Phys Med Biol; 2020 May; 65(9):095008. PubMed ID: 32155594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A treatment planning comparison of intensity modulated photon and proton therapy for paraspinal sarcomas.
Weber DC; Trofimov AV; Delaney TF; Bortfeld T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Apr; 58(5):1596-606. PubMed ID: 15050341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advanced pencil beam scanning Bragg peak FLASH-RT delivery technique can enhance lung cancer planning treatment outcomes compared to conventional multiple-energy proton PBS techniques.
Wei S; Lin H; Isabelle Choi J; Shi C; Simone CB; Kang M
Radiother Oncol; 2022 Oct; 175():238-247. PubMed ID: 35961583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uncertainty reduction in intensity modulated proton therapy by inverse Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Morávek Z; Rickhey M; Hartmann M; Bogner L
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4803-19. PubMed ID: 19622848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Spot Size and Beam-Shaping Devices on the Treatment Plan Quality for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.
Moteabbed M; Yock TI; Depauw N; Madden TM; Kooy HM; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):190-198. PubMed ID: 27084640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the beam direction search space in computerized non-coplanar beam angle optimization for IMRT-prostate SBRT.
Rossi L; Breedveld S; Heijmen BJ; Voet PW; Lanconelli N; Aluwini S
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Sep; 57(17):5441-58. PubMed ID: 22864234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The potential of intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy to reduce swallowing dysfunction in the treatment of head and neck cancer: A planning comparative study.
van der Laan HP; van de Water TA; van Herpt HE; Christianen ME; Bijl HP; Korevaar EW; Rasch CR; van 't Veld AA; van der Schaaf A; Schilstra C; Langendijk JA;
Acta Oncol; 2013 Apr; 52(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 22708528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
