132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24029820)
1. Constructing "proper" ROCs from ordinal response data using weighted power functions.
Mossman D; Peng H
Med Decis Making; 2014 May; 34(4):523-35. PubMed ID: 24029820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using Dual Beta Distributions to Create "Proper" ROC Curves Based on Rating Category Data.
Mossman D; Peng H
Med Decis Making; 2016 Apr; 36(3):349-65. PubMed ID: 25911601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The "proper" binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data.
Pan X; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 1997 May; 4(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 9156236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Equivalence of binormal likelihood-ratio and bi-chi-squared ROC curve models.
Hillis SL
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2031-57. PubMed ID: 26608405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using the mean-to-sigma ratio as a measure of the improperness of binormal ROC curves.
Hillis SL; Berbaum KS
Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 21232682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "Proper" Binormal ROC Curves: Theory and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation.
Metz CE; Pan X
J Math Psychol; 1999 Mar; 43(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 10069933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Semiparametric estimation of the relationship between ROC operating points and the test-result scale: application to the proper binormal model.
Pesce LL; Horsch K; Drukker K; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1537-48. PubMed ID: 22055797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part III. Initial evaluation with detection ROC data.
Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS
Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):438-47. PubMed ID: 10845403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proper receiver operating characteristic analysis: the bigamma model.
Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS; Metz CE; Lenth RV; Hanley JA; Abu Dagga H
Acad Radiol; 1997 Feb; 4(2):138-49. PubMed ID: 9061087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part II. A formal model.
Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS
Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):427-37. PubMed ID: 10845402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ROC curves predicted by a model of visual search.
Chakraborty DP
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jul; 51(14):3463-82. PubMed ID: 16825743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the convexity of ROC curves estimated from radiological test results.
Pesce LL; Metz CE; Berbaum KS
Acad Radiol; 2010 Aug; 17(8):960-968.e4. PubMed ID: 20599155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves.
Pesce LL; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jul; 14(7):814-29. PubMed ID: 17574132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Confidence bands for receiver operating characteristic curves.
Ma G; Hall WJ
Med Decis Making; 1993; 13(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 8412547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part I. Some interesting examples of binormal degeneracy.
Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS; Brandser EA
Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):420-6. PubMed ID: 10845401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Goodness-of-fit issues in ROC curve estimation.
Walsh SJ
Med Decis Making; 1999; 19(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 10231082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Resampling techniques in the analysis of non-binormal ROC data.
Mossman D
Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 8544679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
