BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24029897)

  • 1. Breast density and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Reynolds A
    Radiol Technol; 2013; 85(1):63M-82M; quiz 83M-85M. PubMed ID: 24029897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening for dense breasts: digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Destounis SV; Morgan R; Arieno A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 25615747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Baldwin P
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 81(1):57M-74M. PubMed ID: 19738189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. VOLUMETRIC LOCALISATION OF DENSE BREAST TISSUE USING BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS DATA.
    Dustler M; Petersson H; Timberg P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):392-7. PubMed ID: 26922782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
    Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection and characterization of breast lesions in a selective diagnostic population: diagnostic accuracy study for comparison between one-view digital breast tomosynthesis and two-view full-field digital mammography.
    Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150743. PubMed ID: 27072391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Articles strike a chord: conflicting research.
    Smith A
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(5):586; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 24806066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammographic density estimation: one-to-one comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using fully automated software.
    Tagliafico A; Tagliafico G; Astengo D; Cavagnetto F; Rosasco R; Rescinito G; Monetti F; Calabrese M
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Jun; 22(6):1265-70. PubMed ID: 22358426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
    Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast percent density: estimation on digital mammograms and central tomosynthesis projections.
    Bakic PR; Carton AK; Kontos D; Zhang C; Troxel AB; Maidment AD
    Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 19420321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of visibility of circumscribed masses on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2D mammography: are circumscribed masses better visualized and assured of being benign on DBT?
    Nakashima K; Uematsu T; Itoh T; Takahashi K; Nishimura S; Hayashi T; Sugino T
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):570-577. PubMed ID: 27236817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound: Additional roles in dense breasts with category 0 at conventional digital mammography.
    Lee WK; Chung J; Cha ES; Lee JE; Kim JH
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):291-296. PubMed ID: 26499000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Johnson MM
    Radiol Technol; 2017 Jan; 88(3):299M-319M. PubMed ID: 28298592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical implementation of synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis in a routine clinical practice.
    Freer PE; Riegert J; Eisenmenger L; Ose D; Winkler N; Stein MA; Stoddard GJ; Hess R
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28780702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in the Diagnostic Setting: Indications and Clinical Applications.
    Peppard HR; Nicholson BE; Rochman CM; Merchant JK; Mayo RC; Harvey JA
    Radiographics; 2015; 35(4):975-90. PubMed ID: 26024062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of digital breast tomosynthesis with mammography for breast cancer screening or diagnosis.
    ; ;
    Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ; 2014 Jan; 28(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 24730082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategies to Increase Cancer Detection: Review of True-Positive and False-Negative Results at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening.
    Korhonen KE; Weinstein SP; McDonald ES; Conant EF
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(7):1954-1965. PubMed ID: 27715711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Synthesized Digital Mammography Imaging.
    Freer PE; Winkler N
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 28411676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.