271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2403026)
1. Multiple sclerosis. Magnetic resonance imaging, evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid analysis.
David P; Ristori GP; Elia M; Bartoli A; Ciervo A; Massaro AR; Carbone G
Acta Neurol (Napoli); 1990 Jun; 12(3):200-6. PubMed ID: 2403026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The diagnostic value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography, multimodal evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid examination in multiple sclerosis].
Staffen W; Trinka E; Ladurner G
Nervenarzt; 1993 Apr; 64(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 8506010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association between clinical conversion to multiple sclerosis in radiologically isolated syndrome and magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid, and visual evoked potential: follow-up of 70 patients.
Lebrun C; Bensa C; Debouverie M; Wiertlevski S; Brassat D; de Seze J; Rumbach L; Pelletier J; Labauge P; Brochet B; Tourbah A; Clavelou P;
Arch Neurol; 2009 Jul; 66(7):841-6. PubMed ID: 19597085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-clinical tests for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
Rossini PM; Caramia M; Lavaroni F; Spadaro M; Floris R; Tanfani G; Zarola F; Traversa R; Marciani MG; Bernardi G
Riv Neurol; 1987; 57(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 3629127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance imaging in isolated noncompressive spinal cord syndromes.
Miller DH; McDonald WI; Blumhardt LD; du Boulay GH; Halliday AM; Johnson G; Kendall BE; Kingsley DP; MacManus DG; Moseley IF
Ann Neurol; 1987 Dec; 22(6):714-23. PubMed ID: 3435080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and other techniques in 39 multiple sclerosis patients.
Comi G; Canal N; Martinelli V; Medaglini S; Locatelli T; Triulzi F; Del Maschio A; Banfi G
Riv Neurol; 1987; 57(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 3629129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis by evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study.
Cutler JR; Aminoff MJ; Brant-Zawadzki M
Ann Neurol; 1986 Nov; 20(5):645-8. PubMed ID: 3789682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Acute myelopathies in young patients and multiple sclerosis. prospective study of 20 cases].
Dalecky A; Pelletier J; Chérif AA; Lévrier O; Khalil R
Rev Neurol (Paris); 1997 Oct; 153(10):569-78. PubMed ID: 9684021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The combined use of instrumental and laboratory examinations in multiple sclerosis: is the diagnostic facilitation real?].
Paolino E; Granieri E; Tola MR; Govoni V; Casetta I; Monetti VC; Carreras M
Riv Neurol; 1990; 60(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 2247751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
Hamilton-Bruce MA; Black AB; Chappell DJ; Pannall PR
Clin Exp Neurol; 1989; 26():89-97. PubMed ID: 2642142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiple sclerosis diagnosis: magnetic resonance imaging compared with other instrumental examinations.
Rumbach L; Collard M; Warter JM; Marescaux C; Armspach JP; Gounot D; Chambron J
Ital J Neurol Sci; 1987 Jun; Suppl 6():125-8. PubMed ID: 3654174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Visual, early auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis (917 cases)].
Fischer C; Mauguière F; Ibañez V; Courjon J
Rev Neurol (Paris); 1986; 142(5):517-23. PubMed ID: 3787054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are somatosensory evoked potentials of the tibial nerve the most sensitive test in diagnosing multiple sclerosis?
Djuric S; Djuric V; Zivkovic M; Milosevic V; Jolic M; Stamenovic J; Djordjevic G; Calixto M
Neurol India; 2010; 58(4):537-41. PubMed ID: 20739788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Visual evoked potentials and click-evoked brainstem potentials in early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: statistics (author's transl)].
Lehmann D; Soukos I
Nervenarzt; 1982 Jun; 53(6):327-32. PubMed ID: 7110454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical, magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid and electrophysiological characteristics of the earliest multiple sclerosis.
Rot U; Ledinek AH; Jazbec SS
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2008 Mar; 110(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 18093725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative study of visual evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis].
Miletto G; Merlihot JM; Nezri M; Stanoyevitch JF; Pernet-Rambaud C; Houis B
J Fr Ophtalmol; 1988; 11(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 3385127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory evoked potentials test battery related to magnetic resonance imaging for multiple sclerosis patients.
Antonelli AR; Bonfioli F; Cappiello J; Peretti G; Zanetti D; Capra R
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1988; 30():191-6. PubMed ID: 3227268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Failure to develop multiple sclerosis in patients with neurologic symptoms without objective evidence.
Boster A; Caon C; Perumal J; Hreha S; Zabad R; Zak I; Tselis A; Lisak R; Khan O
Mult Scler; 2008 Jul; 14(6):804-8. PubMed ID: 18573830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multimodal evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: a contribution to diagnosis and classification.
Cosi V; Citterio A; Battelli G; Bergamaschi R; Grampa G; Callieco R
Ital J Neurol Sci; 1987 Jun; Suppl 6():109-12. PubMed ID: 3654170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Magnetic stimulation motor evoked potential in multiple sclerosis. Comparison with visual evoked potentials, brain stem auditory evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials].
Cui L
Zhonghua Shen Jing Jing Shen Ke Za Zhi; 1992 Jun; 25(3):130-2, 189. PubMed ID: 1395937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
