These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24032326)

  • 1. A comparison of Hispanic middle school students' performance, and perceived and actual physical exertion, on the traditional and treadmill one-mile runs.
    Latham DT; Hill GM; Petray CK
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Apr; 116(2):505-11. PubMed ID: 24032326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-validation of an equating method linking aerobic FITNESSGRAM® field tests.
    Boiarskaia EA; Boscolo MS; Zhu W; Mahar MT
    Am J Prev Med; 2011 Oct; 41(4 Suppl 2):S124-30. PubMed ID: 21961612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the Omni Scale of Perceived Exertion in a sample of Spanish-speaking youth from the USA.
    Suminski RR; Robertson RJ; Goss FL; Olvera N
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Aug; 107(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 18986045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Precision, Accuracy, and Performance Outcomes of Perceived Exertion vs. Heart Rate Guided Run-training.
    Johnson EC; Pryor RR; Casa DJ; Ellis LA; Maresh CM; Pescatello LS; Ganio MS; Lee EC; Armstrong LE
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Mar; 31(3):630-637. PubMed ID: 27442332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of anticipation during unknown or unexpected exercise duration on rating of perceived exertion, affect, and physiological function.
    Baden DA; McLean TL; Tucker R; Noakes TD; St Clair Gibson A
    Br J Sports Med; 2005 Oct; 39(10):742-6; discussion 742-6. PubMed ID: 16183771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Criterion-related validity of the one-mile run/walk test in children aged 8-17 years.
    Castro-Pinero J; Mora J; Gonzalez-Montesinos JL; Sjostrom M; Ruiz JR
    J Sports Sci; 2009 Feb; 27(4):405-13. PubMed ID: 19191063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reliability of distance run tests for children in grades K-4.
    Rikli RE; Petray C; Baumgartner TA
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1992 Sep; 63(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 1513957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of PCERT and OMNI walk/run ratings of perceived exertion.
    Roemmich JN; Barkley JE; Epstein LH; Lobarinas CL; White TM; Foster JH
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2006 May; 38(5):1014-9. PubMed ID: 16672857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interrelation of one mile running time and HST score among rural school boys.
    Mahanta S; Chandra AM; Sadhu N
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1994 Jun; 23(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 7844357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a shallow water running test for the estimation of peak aerobic power.
    Kaminsky LA; Wehrli KW; Mahon AD; Robbins GC; Powers DL; Whaley MH
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1993 Nov; 25(11):1287-92. PubMed ID: 8289618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual responses to deep water running and treadmill exercise.
    Brown SP; Chitwood LF; Beason KR; McLemore DR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Aug; 83(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 8873185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of effort at low and moderate intensity exercise in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.
    Bell W; Warner JT; Evans WD; Webb DK; Mullen RH; Gregory JW
    Ann Hum Biol; 2006; 33(3):357-71. PubMed ID: 17092872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Palm cooling does not improve running performance.
    Scheadler CM; Saunders NW; Hanson NJ; Devor ST
    Int J Sports Med; 2013 Aug; 34(8):732-5. PubMed ID: 23444094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of music tempo and loudness level on treadmill exercise.
    Edworthy J; Waring H
    Ergonomics; 2006 Dec; 49(15):1597-610. PubMed ID: 17090506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test of the classic model for predicting endurance running performance.
    McLaughlin JE; Howley ET; Bassett DR; Thompson DL; Fitzhugh EC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2010 May; 42(5):991-7. PubMed ID: 19997010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regulation of exercise intensity using ratings of perceived exertion during passive visual distraction.
    Hull GR; Potteiger JA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Oct; 89(2):684-94. PubMed ID: 10597605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physiologic responses to running with a jogging stroller.
    Gregory DA; Pfeiffer KA; Vickers KE; Aubrey AJ; Flynn JI; Connolly CP; Coe DP
    Int J Sports Med; 2012 Sep; 33(9):711-5. PubMed ID: 22562731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. VO2max estimation from a submaximal 1-mile track jog for fit college-age individuals.
    George JD; Vehrs PR; Allsen PE; Fellingham GW; Fisher AG
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1993 Mar; 25(3):401-6. PubMed ID: 8455458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of music on perceived exertion, plasma lactate, norepinephrine and cardiovascular hemodynamics during treadmill running.
    Szmedra L; Bacharach DW
    Int J Sports Med; 1998 Jan; 19(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 9506797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ratings of perceived exertion among standard treadmill protocols and steady state running.
    Glass SC; Whaley MH; Wegner MS
    Int J Sports Med; 1991 Feb; 12(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 2030065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.