These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

49 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24032471)

  • 1. Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Contact Finite Element Analysis of Mandibular All-on-4 Design.
    Hussein MO; Rabie ME
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Apr; 41(2):e12-8. PubMed ID: 24032471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of bone mass density and alveolar bone resorption on stress in implant restoration of free-end edentulous posterior mandible: Finite element analysis of double-factor sensitivity.
    Ye Z; Ye H; Wu Y; Jiang Z; Yao H; Xu X; Zhang Y; Du W; Li W; Zheng Y; Ye P; Ding X; Wu L
    Ann Anat; 2024 Apr; 253():152210. PubMed ID: 38244942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of stress distribution around all-on-four implants of different angulations and zygoma implants: a 7-model finite element analysis.
    Tezerişener HA; Özalp Ö; Altay MA; Sindel A
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):176. PubMed ID: 38310260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A finite element analysis study on different angle correction designs for inclined implants in All-On-Four protocol.
    Ibrahim CRM; Sameh A; Askar O
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):331. PubMed ID: 38481220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative evaluation of stress distribution between an All-on-Four implant-supported prosthesis and the Trefoil implant-supported prosthesis: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
    Murugaian J; Ganesan L; Shankar MSS; Annapoorni H
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 36510948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of short implants placed in the posterior region on tilted implants in the 'All-On-Four' treatment concept: a three-dimensional finite element stress analysis.
    Özil E; Özkan N; Keskin M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024 Jul; 27(9):1171-1180. PubMed ID: 37450571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical effects of inclined implant shoulder design in all-on-four treatment concept: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Aktas T; Diker N
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2023 Dec; 68(6):583-591. PubMed ID: 37283247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical influence of narrow-diameter implants placed at the crestal and subcrestal level in the maxillary anterior region. A 3D finite element analysis.
    Cruz RS; Fernandes E Oliveira HF; Lemos CAA; de Souza Batista VE; Capalbo da Silva R; Verri FR
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 33(2):180-187. PubMed ID: 36799260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is All-on-four effective in case of partial mandibular resection? A 3D finite element study.
    Dario V; Michelangelo-Santo G; Roberto B; Fabio F
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Oct; 124(5):101463. PubMed ID: 37028491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical analysis of peri-prosthetic bone response to hybrid threaded zirconia dental implants: An in silico model.
    Mishra D; Basu B
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Feb; 150():106310. PubMed ID: 38128471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparative finite element analysis between a conventional proximal interphalangeal joint flexible hinge implant and a novel implant design using a rolling contact joint mechanism.
    Kim YJ; Bae HA; Hong SW
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Dec; 18(1):976. PubMed ID: 38115076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Effect of Buccolingual and Apicocoronal Positions of Dental Implants on Stress and Strain in Alveolar Bone by Finite Element Analysis.
    Massoumi F; Taheri M; Mohammadi A; Amelirad O
    J Dent (Tehran); 2018 Jan; 15(1):10-19. PubMed ID: 29971117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How does the Number of Implants Affect Stress Distribution in Fibula Graft at the Posterior of the Mandible? A Finite Element Analysis.
    Latifi F; Tabrizi R; Hosseinikordkheili M
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2023 Jun; 22(2):304-312. PubMed ID: 37122787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical Influence of Edentulous Mandibular Morphology on Peri-implant Bone in Implant Prosthetics: Threedimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Hamada T; Gonda T; Murase K; Maeda Y; Ikebe K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Feb; 0(0):. PubMed ID: 38394439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of bone levels on stress distribution around all-on-four concept: A 3-D finite element analysis.
    Acar G; Özer T
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 May; ():101905. PubMed ID: 38702013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of frontal trauma on the edentulous mandible with four different interforaminal implant-prosthodontic anchoring configurations. A 3D finite element analysis.
    Krennmair S; Malek M; Stehrer R; Stähler P; Otto S; Postl L
    Eur J Med Res; 2023 Dec; 28(1):608. PubMed ID: 38115128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and validation of a digital twin of the human lower jaw under impact loading by using non-linear finite element analyses.
    Demir O; Uslan I; Buyuk M; Salamci MU
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Dec; 148():106207. PubMed ID: 37922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prosthetic framework improvement using lattice structure: A comparative finite element study of a mandibular implant-supported prosthesis.
    Lemaire S; Bouby C; Thiebaud F; Berry-Kromer V
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Jul; 155():106538. PubMed ID: 38608345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of customized 3-dimensional printed mandibular prostheses with a dental implant pressure-reducing device in mandibular body defect: A finite element study performing multiresponse surface methodology.
    Chen CF; Huang WC; Liu SH; Wang LL; Liu PF; Chen PH; Chen CM
    J Dent Sci; 2024 Jan; 19(1):502-514. PubMed ID: 38303793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Two Types of Patient Specific Implants (PSI) and Quad Zygoma Implant (QZI) for Rehabilitation of Post-COVID Maxillary Mucormycosis Defect (PCMMD): Finite Element Analysis.
    Manekar VS; Datarkar AN; Ghormode A; Daware S; Pandilwar P; Sapkal P
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2023 Sep; 22(3):688-694. PubMed ID: 37534346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.