120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24032487)
1. Empiric validation of simulation models for estimating glucose meter performance criteria for moderate levels of glycemic control.
Karon BS; Boyd JC; Klee GG
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2013 Dec; 15(12):996-1003. PubMed ID: 24032487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Glucose meter performance criteria for tight glycemic control estimated by simulation modeling.
Karon BS; Boyd JC; Klee GG
Clin Chem; 2010 Jul; 56(7):1091-7. PubMed ID: 20511447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Glucose Meter Error on Glycemic Variability and Time in Target Range During Glycemic Control After Cardiovascular Surgery.
Karon BS; Meeusen JW; Bryant SC
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 10(2):336-42. PubMed ID: 26311721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An insulin-dose error assessment grid: A new tool to evaluate glucose meter performance.
Lyon ME; Lyon OAS; Tran NK; DuBois JA; Lyon AW
Clin Biochem; 2019 Aug; 70():30-33. PubMed ID: 31170380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimated Risk for Insulin Dose Error Among Hospital Patients Due to Glucose Meter Hematocrit Bias in 2020.
Inman M; Lyon AW; Lyon OAS; Lyon ME
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2020 Oct; 144(10):1204-1208. PubMed ID: 33002153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Impact of Blood Glucose Monitoring Accuracy: An In-Silico Study.
Campos-Náñez E; Fortwaengler K; Breton MD
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1187-1195. PubMed ID: 28569076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Significant insulin dose errors may occur if blood glucose results are obtained from miscoded meters.
Raine CH; Schrock LE; Edelman SV; Mudaliar SR; Zhong W; Proud LJ; Parkes JL
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 1(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 19888408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Importance of blood glucose meter and carbohydrate estimation accuracy.
Virdi NS; Mahoney JJ
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 6(4):921-6. PubMed ID: 22920820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality specifications for glucose meters: assessment by simulation modeling of errors in insulin dose.
Boyd JC; Bruns DE
Clin Chem; 2001 Feb; 47(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 11159768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Glucose clamp algorithms and insulin time-action profiles.
Bequette BW
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2009 Sep; 3(5):1005-13. PubMed ID: 20144413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. EVALUATION OF TOTAL DAILY DOSE AND GLYCEMIC CONTROL FOR PATIENTS TAKING U-500 REGULAR INSULIN ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL.
Paulus AO; Colburn JA; True MW; Beckman DJ; Davis RP; Wardian JL; Graybill SD; Folaron I; Lewi JE
Endocr Pract; 2016 Oct; 22(10):1187-1191. PubMed ID: 27359287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Software-guided insulin dosing improves intrapartum glycemic management in women with diabetes mellitus.
Dinglas C; Muscat J; Adams T; Peragallo-Dittko V; Vintzileos A; Heo HJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):191.e1-191.e6. PubMed ID: 29750952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a novel continuous glucose monitoring-based method for mealtime insulin dosing--the iBolus--in subjects with type 1 diabetes using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy: a randomized controlled trial.
Rossetti P; Ampudia-Blasco FJ; Laguna A; Revert A; Vehì J; Ascaso JF; Bondia J
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Nov; 14(11):1043-52. PubMed ID: 23003329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Description and preliminary evaluation of a Multiagent Intelligent Dosing System (MAIDS) to manage combination insulin-oral agent therapy in type 2 diabetes.
Cook CB; McMichael JP; Dunbar VG; Lieberman R
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Dec; 7(6):937-47. PubMed ID: 16386100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bedside Glucose Monitoring-Is it Safe? A New, Regulatory-Compliant Risk Assessment Evaluation Protocol in Critically Ill Patient Care Settings.
DuBois JA; Slingerland RJ; Fokkert M; Roman A; Tran NK; Clarke W; Sartori DA; Palmieri TL; Malic A; Lyon ME; Lyon AW
Crit Care Med; 2017 Apr; 45(4):567-574. PubMed ID: 28169943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of insulin infusion protocols targeting 110-140 mg/dL in patients after cardiac surgery.
Magaji V; Nayak S; Donihi AC; Willard L; Jampana S; Nivedita P; Eder R; Johnston J; Korytkowski MT
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Nov; 14(11):1013-7. PubMed ID: 23046399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosing accuracy of insulin pens versus conventional syringes and vials.
Luijf YM; DeVries JH
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Jun; 12 Suppl 1():S73-7. PubMed ID: 20515311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of a glucose meter with a built-in automated bolus calculator versus manual bolus calculation in insulin-using subjects.
Sussman A; Taylor EJ; Patel M; Ward J; Alva S; Lawrence A; Ng R
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 6(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 22538144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oral insulin product hexyl-insulin monoconjugate 2 (HIM2) in type 1 diabetes mellitus: the glucose stabilization effects of HIM2.
Clement S; Still JG; Kosutic G; McAllister RG
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2002; 4(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 12396740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A crossover comparison of glycemic variations in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes receiving insulin glargine versus insulin detemir twice daily using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): J COLLECTION (Jikei COmparison of Lantus and LEvemir with Cgm for Thinking Insulin OptimizatioN).
Tsujino D; Nishimura R; Morimoto A; Tajima N; Utsunomiya K
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Jul; 14(7):596-601. PubMed ID: 22775404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
