203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24032689)
1. Quantitative sonoelastography of the uterine cervix by interposition of a synthetic reference material.
Hee L; Sandager P; Petersen O; Uldbjerg N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Nov; 92(11):1244-9. PubMed ID: 24032689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative sonoelastography of the uterine cervix prior to induction of labor as a predictor of cervical dilation time.
Hee L; Rasmussen CK; Schlütter JM; Sandager P; Uldbjerg N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jul; 93(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 24702544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Hertzian contact mechanics based formulation to improve ultrasound elastography assessment of uterine cervical tissue stiffness.
Briggs BN; Stender ME; Muljadi PM; Donnelly MA; Winn VD; Ferguson VL
J Biomech; 2015 Jun; 48(9):1524-32. PubMed ID: 26003483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative strain elastography of the uterine cervix assessed by the GE Voluson E10 system in combination with a force-measuring device.
Rohr Thomsen C; Leonhard AK; Strandbo Schmidt Jensen M; Bor P; Hinge M; Uldbjerg N; Sandager P
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2023 Dec; 36(1):2213797. PubMed ID: 37202178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative Evaluation of the Normal Cervix, Cervical Cancer, and Cervical Precancerous Changes Via Real-Time Shear Wave Elastography.
Guo YJ; Yan XJ; Zhao HX; Wen XD; Wang J; Du YY; Wang N; Yang Y
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Feb; 42(2):345-354. PubMed ID: 35338721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative elastography of the uterine cervix requires a reference material-Reply.
Hee L; Uldbjerg N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 May; 93(5):525. PubMed ID: 24576040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Elastography in the examination of the uterine cervix before labor induction].
Preis K; Swiatkowska-Freund M; Pankrac Z
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):757-61. PubMed ID: 21117304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Elastography assessment of the cervix during cervical maturation].
Kaouther D; Olivier A
Tunis Med; 2014 Jul; 92(7):448-51. PubMed ID: 25775282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical elastography during pregnancy: a critical review of current approaches with a focus on controversies and limitations.
Fruscalzo A; Mazza E; Feltovich H; Schmitz R
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2016 Oct; 43(4):493-504. PubMed ID: 27259500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the cervix in pregnant women with a history of cervical insufficiency during the first trimester using elastography.
Chen CY; Chen CP; Sun FJ
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Nov; 99(11):1497-1503. PubMed ID: 32564364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel fast full inversion based breast ultrasound elastography technique.
Karimi H; Fenster A; Samani A
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 58(7):2219-33. PubMed ID: 23475227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sonoelastography of the uterine cervix.
Fuchs T; Pomorski M; Zimmer M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 May; 93(5):524. PubMed ID: 24575821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Elastography of the uterine cervix: implications for success of induction of labor.
Swiatkowska-Freund M; Preis K
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 38(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 21484905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Overview of the methods available for biomechanical testing of the uterine cervix in vivo.
Hee L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Dec; 93(12):1219-37. PubMed ID: 25174701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of quantitative elastography of the uterine cervix in at-term pregnancies.
Fruscalzo A; Steinhard J; Londero AP; Fröhlich C; Bijnens B; Klockenbusch W; Schmitz R
J Perinat Med; 2013 Jul; 41(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 23392904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Towards quantitative quasi-static ultrasound elastography using a reference layer for liver imaging application: A preliminary assessment.
Selladurai S; Thittai AK
Ultrasonics; 2019 Mar; 93():7-17. PubMed ID: 30384008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting labor induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Londero AP; Schmitz R; Bertozzi S; Driul L; Fruscalzo A
J Perinat Med; 2016 Mar; 44(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 26011923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A force-measuring device combined with ultrasound-based elastography for assessment of the uterine cervix.
Thomsen CR; Jensen MSS; Leonhard AK; Mortensen TØ; Bor P; Sandager P; Hinge M; Uldbjerg N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Feb; 101(2):241-247. PubMed ID: 35049047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Effect of Tissue Compression on the Results of Shear Wave Elastography Measurements.
Vachutka J; Sedlackova Z; Furst T; Herman M; Herman J; Salzman R; Dolezal L
Ultrason Imaging; 2018 Nov; 40(6):380-393. PubMed ID: 30101677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical HI-RTE elastography and pregnancy outcome: a prospective study.
Sabiani L; Haumonte JB; Loundou A; Caro AS; Brunet J; Cocallemen JF; D'ercole C; Bretelle F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():80-4. PubMed ID: 25666343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
