BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2403332)

  • 1. Crossbreeding as a tool for genetic improvement of chickens in suboptimum environments.
    Katule AM
    Beitr Trop Landwirtsch Veterinarmed; 1990; 28(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 2403332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the productive performances of the Sinai Bedouin fowl, the White Leghorn and their crossbreds: study under natural desert conditions.
    Arad Z; Marder J
    Br Poult Sci; 1982 Jul; 23(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 7127171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-breeding performance of white Leghorn and Australorp lines selected under continuous light for short interval between eggs: full-year egg production and efficiency of food utilisation.
    Yoo BH; Sheldon BL; Podger RN
    Br Poult Sci; 1984 Apr; 25(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 6733555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pre-pubertal and postpartum anestrus in tropical Zebu cattle.
    Abeygunawardena H; Dematawewa CM
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2004 Jul; 82-83():373-87. PubMed ID: 15271467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of breeding objectives for purebred and crossbred selection schemes for adoption in indigenous chicken breeding programmes.
    Okeno TO; Kahi AK; Peters KJ
    Br Poult Sci; 2013; 54(1):62-75. PubMed ID: 23444855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of indigenous, Khaki Campbell and their reciprocal crossbred layer ducks under different management systems.
    Nageswara AR; Ramasubba Reddy V; Ravindra Reddy V
    Br Poult Sci; 2005 Aug; 46(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 16268099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selection for heterosis from crossbred populations: comparison of the F3 and backcross populations.
    Sheridan AK
    Br Poult Sci; 1986 Dec; 27(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 3815123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selection for heterosis from crossbred populations: estimation of the F1 heterosis and its mode of inheritance.
    Sheridan AK
    Br Poult Sci; 1986 Dec; 27(4):541-50. PubMed ID: 3815122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Gene differential expression of liver tissues in crossbred versus purebred chicken and their relationship with heterosis of meat trait].
    Wang D; Zhang Y; Sun DX; Yu Y; Xu GY; Li JY
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2004 Mar; 31(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 15195564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential gene expression in liver of inbred chickens and their hybrid offspring.
    Sun D; Wang D; Zhang Y; Yu Y; Xu G; Li J
    Anim Genet; 2005 Jun; 36(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 15932399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Heterosis and recombination effects on pig reproductive traits.
    Cassady JP; Young LD; Leymaster KA
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2303-15. PubMed ID: 12350007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Major growth QTLs in fowl are related to fearful behavior: possible genetic links between fear responses and production traits in a red junglefowl x white leghorn intercross.
    Schütz KE; Kerje S; Jacobsson L; Forkman B; Carlborg O; Andersson L; Jensen P
    Behav Genet; 2004 Jan; 34(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 14739702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fertility and hatchability in RIR and WL breeds as functionally modified by crossing them in alternate sex combinations (Gallus domesticus).
    Zelleke G; Moudgal RP; Asmare A
    Br Poult Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 15835261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting body weight, egg character and egg production in F2 intercross chickens.
    Sasaki O; Odawara S; Takahashi H; Nirasawa K; Oyamada Y; Yamamoto R; Ishii K; Nagamine Y; Takeda H; Kobayashi E; Furukawa T
    Anim Genet; 2004 Jun; 35(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 15147389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genotype by environment interaction for lamb weaning weight in two Norwegian sheep breeds.
    Steinheim G; Odegård J; Adnøy T; Klemetsdal G
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Jan; 86(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 17911228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproductive performance and genetic parameters in first cross ewes from different maternal genotypes.
    Afolayan RA; Fogarty NM; Gilmour AR; Ingham VM; Gaunt GM; Cummins LJ
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Apr; 86(4):804-14. PubMed ID: 18156352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Association of parameters of crossbreeding effect for traits of growth and meat-production with average band-sharing of RAPD markers in commercial crosses of Duroc, Landrace and large white pigs].
    Shi QS; Liu XC; Wu XL
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2001 Aug; 28(8):722-9. PubMed ID: 11554346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of production systems for efficient use of indigenous pig breeds in developing countries.
    Furukawa T; Nirasawa K; Ishii K; Thuy le T; Satoh M
    Anim Sci J; 2013 Mar; 84(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 23480699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of the interaction of dams with hatches, sires in breed, and breed of sire for five traits in the fowl.
    Vasquez CG; Bohren BB
    Poult Sci; 1983 Nov; 62(11):2125-9. PubMed ID: 6657556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crossbreeding to improve local chicken breeds: predicting growth performance of the crosses using the Gompertz model and estimated heterosis.
    Mancinelli AC; Menchetti L; Birolo M; Bittante G; Chiattelli D; Castellini C
    Poult Sci; 2023 Aug; 102(8):102783. PubMed ID: 37269793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.