724 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24033397)
1. Use of inverse spatial conservation prioritization to avoid biological diversity loss outside protected areas.
Kareksela S; Moilanen A; Tuominen S; Kotiaho JS
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1294-303. PubMed ID: 24033397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Economic and ecological outcomes of flexible biodiversity offset systems.
Habib TJ; Farr DR; Schneider RR; Boutin S
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1313-23. PubMed ID: 23869724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exposing ecological and economic costs of the research-implementation gap and compromises in decision making.
Kareksela S; Moilanen A; Ristaniemi O; Välivaara R; Kotiaho JS
Conserv Biol; 2018 Feb; 32(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 29139572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conservation businesses and conservation planning in a biological diversity hotspot.
Di Minin E; Macmillan DC; Goodman PS; Escott B; Slotow R; Moilanen A
Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):808-20. PubMed ID: 23565917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A conservation planning approach to mitigate the impacts of leakage from protected area networks.
Bode M; Tulloch AI; Mills M; Venter O; Ando AW
Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):765-74. PubMed ID: 25494874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accounting for spatial heterogeneity in the added conservation value of land protection when prioritizing protected areas.
Yoon HS; Vijay V; Armsworth PR
Conserv Biol; 2022 Oct; 36(5):e13960. PubMed ID: 35661264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Constraints of philanthropy on determining the distribution of biodiversity conservation funding.
Larson ER; Howell S; Kareiva P; Armsworth PR
Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):206-15. PubMed ID: 26460820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrating environmental gap analysis with spatial conservation prioritization: a case study from Victoria, Australia.
Sharafi SM; Moilanen A; White M; Burgman M
J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 112():240-51. PubMed ID: 22935646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A quantitative method for zoning of protected areas and its spatial ecological implications.
Del Carmen Sabatini M; Verdiell A; Rodríguez Iglesias RM; Vidal M
J Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 83(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 16690203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding the effects of different social data on selecting priority conservation areas.
Karimi A; Tulloch AIT; Brown G; Hockings M
Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1439-1449. PubMed ID: 28425128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Restoration planning to guide Aichi targets in a megadiverse country.
Tobón W; Urquiza-Haas T; Koleff P; Schröter M; Ortega-Álvarez R; Campo J; Lindig-Cisneros R; Sarukhán J; Bonn A
Conserv Biol; 2017 Oct; 31(5):1086-1097. PubMed ID: 28233917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prioritizing conservation effort through the use of biological soil crusts as ecosystem function indicators in an arid region.
Bowker MA; Miller ME; Belnap J; Sisk TD; Johnson NC
Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1533-43. PubMed ID: 18759770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation.
Whitehead AL; Kujala H; Ives CD; Gordon A; Lentini PE; Wintle BA; Nicholson E; Raymond CM
Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):992-1003. PubMed ID: 24617898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving effectiveness of systematic conservation planning with density data.
Veloz S; Salas L; Altman B; Alexander J; Jongsomjit D; Elliott N; Ballard G
Conserv Biol; 2015 Aug; 29(4):1217-1227. PubMed ID: 25873240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A hybrid scheme for comparing the effects of bird diversity conservation approaches on landscape patterns and biodiversity in the Shangan sub-watershed in Taiwan.
Wu CF; Lin YP; Lin SH
J Environ Manage; 2011 Jul; 92(7):1809-20. PubMed ID: 21450396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Representation of critical natural capital in China.
Lü Y; Zhang L; Zeng Y; Fu B; Whitham C; Liu S; Wu B
Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 28218967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Guidelines and incentives for conservation development in local land-use regulations.
Reed SE; Hilty JA; Theobald DM
Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):258-68. PubMed ID: 24001140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ecological sustainability as the fourth landmark in the development of conservation ethics.
White PS; Tuttle JP
Conserv Biol; 2013 Oct; 27(5):952-7. PubMed ID: 24033797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial, socio-economic, and ecological implications of incorporating minimum size constraints in marine protected area network design.
Metcalfe K; Vaughan G; Vaz S; Smith RJ
Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1615-25. PubMed ID: 26219669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term spatio-temporal changes in a West African bushmeat trade system.
McNamara J; Kusimi JM; Rowcliffe JM; Cowlishaw G; Brenyah A; Milner-Gulland EJ
Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1446-57. PubMed ID: 26104770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
