These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24033732)
1. Actual and potential use of population viability analyses in recovery of plant species listed under the US endangered species act. Zeigler SL; Che-Castaldo JP; Neel MC Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1265-78. PubMed ID: 24033732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A framework for developing objective and measurable recovery criteria for threatened and endangered species. Himes Boor GK Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 24112040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing metapopulation connectivity criteria from genetic and habitat data to recover the endangered Mexican wolf. Carroll C; Fredrickson RJ; Lacy RC Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 24112074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Climate change, marine environments, and the US Endangered species act. Seney EE; Rowland MJ; Lowery RA; Griffis RB; McClure MM Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1138-46. PubMed ID: 24299080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incorporating climate science in applications of the US endangered species act for aquatic species. McClure MM; Alexander M; Borggaard D; Boughton D; Crozier L; Griffis R; Jorgensen JC; Lindley ST; Nye J; Rowland MJ; Seney EE; Snover A; Toole C; VAN Houtan K Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1222-33. PubMed ID: 24299088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Structuring decisions for managing threatened and endangered species in a changing climate. Gregory R; Arvai J; Gerber LR Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1212-21. PubMed ID: 24299087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement and evaluation of national family planning programs. Mauldin WP Demography; 1967 Mar; 4(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 21279762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current practices in the identification of critical habitat for threatened species. Camaclang AE; Maron M; Martin TG; Possingham HP Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):482-92. PubMed ID: 25472827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the impact of the U.S. Endangered Species Act recovery planning guidelines on managing threats for listed species. Troyer CM; Gerber LR Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1423-33. PubMed ID: 26108948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implications of different population model structures for management of threatened plants. Regan HM; Bohórquez CI; Keith DA; Regan TJ; Anderson KE Conserv Biol; 2017 Apr; 31(2):459-468. PubMed ID: 27596063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A protocol for better design, application, and communication of population viability analyses. Pe'er G; Matsinos YG; Johst K; Franz KW; Turlure C; Radchuk V; Malinowska AH; Curtis JM; Naujokaitis-Lewis I; Wintle BA; Henle K Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):644-56. PubMed ID: 23692056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A critical appraisal of population viability analysis. Chaudhary V; Oli MK Conserv Biol; 2020 Feb; 34(1):26-40. PubMed ID: 31435956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Species-level persistence probabilities for recovery and conservation status assessment. Che-Castaldo JP; Neel MC Conserv Biol; 2016 Dec; 30(6):1297-1306. PubMed ID: 27030933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Geography and recovery under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Carroll C; Vucetich JA; Nelson MP; Rohlf DJ; Phillips MK Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 20151988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing decision rules for categorizing species' extinction risk to help develop quantitative listing criteria for the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Regan TJ; Taylor BL; Thompson GG; Cochrane JF; Ralls K; Runge MC; Merrick R Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):821-31. PubMed ID: 23646933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating effects of tidal power projects and climate change on threatened and endangered marine species and their food web. Busch DS; Greene CM; Good TP Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1190-200. PubMed ID: 24299085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ability of matrix models to explain the past and predict the future of plant populations. Crone EE; Ellis MM; Morris WF; Stanley A; Bell T; Bierzychudek P; Ehrlén J; Kaye TN; Knight TM; Lesica P; Oostermeijer G; Quintana-Ascencio PF; Ticktin T; Valverde T; Williams JL; Doak DF; Ganesan R; McEachern K; Thorpe AS; Menges ES Conserv Biol; 2013 Oct; 27(5):968-78. PubMed ID: 23565966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative tools for implementing the new definition of significant portion of the range in the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Earl JE; Nicol S; Wiederholt R; Diffendorfer JE; Semmens D; Flockhart DTT; Mattsson BJ; McCracken G; Norris DR; Thogmartin WE; López-Hoffman L Conserv Biol; 2018 Feb; 32(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 28574183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incorporating climate and ocean change into extinction risk assessments for 82 coral species. Brainard RE; Weijerman M; Eakin CM; McElhany P; Miller MW; Patterson M; Piniak GA; Dunlap MJ; Birkeland C Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1169-78. PubMed ID: 24299083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]