These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24035423)

  • 1. Analysis of restenosis after carotid artery stenting: preliminary results using computational fluid dynamics based on three-dimensional angiography.
    Uemiya N; Lee CJ; Ishihara S; Yamane F; Zhang Y; Qian Y
    J Clin Neurosci; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1582-7. PubMed ID: 24035423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.
    Lal BK; Hobson RW; Tofighi B; Kapadia I; Cuadra S; Jamil Z
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 Jan; 47(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 18178455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computational fluid dynamics of carotid arteries after carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting based on postoperative patient-specific computed tomography angiography and ultrasound flow data.
    Hayase H; Tokunaga K; Nakayama T; Sugiu K; Nishida A; Arimitsu S; Hishikawa T; Ono S; Ohta M; Date I
    Neurosurgery; 2011 Apr; 68(4):1096-101; discussion 1101. PubMed ID: 21221041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of tandem carotid artery stenoses: Investigation of neurological complications after carotid artery stenting.
    Kambayashi Y; Takao H; Shinohara K; Suzuki T; Takayama S; Fujimura S; Masuda S; Watanabe M; Suzuki T; Dahmani C; Ishibashi T; Yamamoto M; Murayama Y
    Technol Health Care; 2016 Sep; 24(5):673-9. PubMed ID: 27233087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determining in-stent stenosis of carotid arteries by duplex ultrasound criteria.
    Stanziale SF; Wholey MH; Boules TN; Selzer F; Makaroun MS
    J Endovasc Ther; 2005 Jun; 12(3):346-53. PubMed ID: 15943510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MRI-based quantification of outflow boundary conditions for computational fluid dynamics of stenosed human carotid arteries.
    Groen HC; Simons L; van den Bouwhuijsen QJ; Bosboom EM; Gijsen FJ; van der Giessen AG; van de Vosse FN; Hofman A; van der Steen AF; Witteman JC; van der Lugt A; Wentzel JJ
    J Biomech; 2010 Aug; 43(12):2332-8. PubMed ID: 20627249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Duplex and contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in evaluation of in-stent restenosis after carotid stenting.
    Clevert DA; Sommer WH; Helck A; Reiser M
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2011; 48(1):199-208. PubMed ID: 21876247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal carotid duplex velocity criteria for defining the severity of carotid in-stent restenosis.
    AbuRahma AF; Abu-Halimah S; Bensenhaver J; Dean LS; Keiffer T; Emmett M; Flaherty S
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 Sep; 48(3):589-94. PubMed ID: 18586444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preliminary study of hemodynamic distribution in patient-specific stenotic carotid bifurcation by image-based computational fluid dynamics.
    Xue YJ; Gao PY; Duan Q; Lin Y; Dai CB
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jun; 49(5):558-65. PubMed ID: 18568543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient based computational fluid dynamic characterization of carotid bifurcation stenosis before and after endovascular revascularization.
    Schirmer CM; Malek AM
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2012 Nov; 4(6):448-54. PubMed ID: 22039041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment strategy and follow-up evaluation for an unruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm associated with pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery using computational fluid dynamics simulations.
    Kono K; Terada T
    Turk Neurosurg; 2014; 24(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 24535805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and efficacy of carotid angioplasty and stenting for radiation-associated carotid artery stenosis.
    Sadek M; Cayne NS; Shin HJ; Turnbull IC; Marin ML; Faries PL
    J Vasc Surg; 2009 Dec; 50(6):1308-13. PubMed ID: 19703754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemodynamic parameters distribution of upstream, stenosis center, and downstream sides of plaques in carotid artery with different stenosis: a MRI and CFD study.
    Sui B; Gao P; Lin Y; Jing L; Sun S; Qin H
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Mar; 56(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 24676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computational analysis of effects of external carotid artery flow and occlusion on adverse carotid bifurcation hemodynamics.
    Hyun S; Kleinstreuer C; Archie JP
    J Vasc Surg; 2003 Jun; 37(6):1248-54. PubMed ID: 12764272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preliminary study of hemodynamics in human carotid bifurcation by computational fluid dynamics combined with magnetic resonance angiography.
    Xue Y; Gao P; Lin Y; Dai C
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Sep; 48(7):788-97. PubMed ID: 17729012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasound velocity criteria for carotid in-stent restenosis.
    Chi YW; White CJ; Woods TC; Goldman CK
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Feb; 69(3):349-54. PubMed ID: 17171655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of morphological and rheological conditions between conventional and eversion carotid endarterectomy using computational fluid dynamics--a pilot study.
    Demirel S; Chen D; Mei Y; Partovi S; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Dadrich M; Böckler D; Kauczor HU; Müller-Eschner M
    Vascular; 2015 Oct; 23(5):474-82. PubMed ID: 25298137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grading carotid intrastent restenosis: a 6-year follow-up study.
    Setacci C; Chisci E; Setacci F; Iacoponi F; de Donato G
    Stroke; 2008 Apr; 39(4):1189-96. PubMed ID: 18292382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Angiographically confirmed stent over expansion in the internal carotid artery during stenting: incidence, predictors, and outcomes.
    Tsutsumi M; Aikawa H; Nii K; Etou H; Sakamoto K; Yoshida H; Matsumoto Y; Hamaguchi S; Kazekawa K
    Neuroradiology; 2012 May; 54(5):481-6. PubMed ID: 21732085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Carotid Geometry as a Predictor of In-Stent Neointimal Hyperplasia　- A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study.
    Yao X; Dai Z; Zhang X; Gao J; Xu G; Cai Y; Li Z
    Circ J; 2019 Jun; 83(7):1472-1479. PubMed ID: 31061352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.