These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24035495)

  • 21. Sample size calculation for stepped wedge and other longitudinal cluster randomised trials.
    Hooper R; Teerenstra S; de Hoop E; Eldridge S
    Stat Med; 2016 Nov; 35(26):4718-4728. PubMed ID: 27350420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Current issues in the design and analysis of stepped wedge trials.
    Hughes JP; Granston TS; Heagerty PJ
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):55-60. PubMed ID: 26247569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The stepped wedge design].
    Dekkers OM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(9):A4069. PubMed ID: 22373553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimal unidirectional switch designs.
    Zhan Z; de Bock GH; van den Heuvel ER
    Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(25):3573-3588. PubMed ID: 30003557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The stepped wedge design does not inherently have more power than a cluster randomized controlled trial.
    Kotz D; Spigt M; Arts IC; Crutzen R; Viechtbauer W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1059-60. PubMed ID: 23953488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. "Cross-sectional" stepped wedge designs always reduce the required sample size when there is no time effect.
    Zhou X; Liao X; Spiegelman D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():108-109. PubMed ID: 28093263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Research Designs for Intervention Research with Small Samples II: Stepped Wedge and Interrupted Time-Series Designs.
    Fok CC; Henry D; Allen J
    Prev Sci; 2015 Oct; 16(7):967-77. PubMed ID: 26017633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Information content of cluster-period cells in stepped wedge trials.
    Kasza J; Forbes AB
    Biometrics; 2019 Mar; 75(1):144-152. PubMed ID: 30051909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A note on "Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials".
    Liao X; Zhou X; Spiegelman D
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt B):338-339. PubMed ID: 26394003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A stepped wedge cluster randomized trial is preferable for assessing complex health interventions.
    Keriel-Gascou M; Buchet-Poyau K; Rabilloud M; Duclos A; Colin C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 67(7):831-3. PubMed ID: 24774471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. There are some circumstances where the stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial is preferable to the alternative: no randomized trial at all. Response to the commentary by Kotz and colleagues.
    Mdege ND; Man MS; Taylor nee Brown CA; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Dec; 65(12):1253-4. PubMed ID: 22968178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of the stepped wedge design cannot be recommended: a critical appraisal and comparison with the classic cluster randomized controlled trial design.
    Kotz D; Spigt M; Arts IC; Crutzen R; Viechtbauer W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Dec; 65(12):1249-52. PubMed ID: 22964070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trials Are the Way Forward to Assess Innovative Electronic Hand Hygiene Monitoring Technologies.
    Cawthorne KR; Cooke RPD
    Clin Infect Dis; 2021 Jul; 73(1):e276-e278. PubMed ID: 33386397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Systematic review of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials shows that design is particularly used to evaluate interventions during routine implementation.
    Mdege ND; Man MS; Taylor Nee Brown CA; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):936-48. PubMed ID: 21411284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Proposed variations of the stepped-wedge design can be used to accommodate multiple interventions.
    Lyons VH; Li L; Hughes JP; Rowhani-Rahbar A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():160-167. PubMed ID: 28412466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Researchers should convince policy makers to perform a classic cluster randomized controlled trial instead of a stepped wedge design when an intervention is rolled out.
    Kotz D; Spigt M; Arts IC; Crutzen R; Viechtbauer W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Dec; 65(12):1255-6. PubMed ID: 22964069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The need to balance merits and limitations from different disciplines when considering the stepped wedge cluster randomized trial design.
    de Hoop E; van der Tweel I; van der Graaf R; Moons KG; van Delden JJ; Reitsma JB; Koffijberg H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():93. PubMed ID: 26514920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stepped wedge cluster randomized trials are efficient and provide a method of evaluation without which some interventions would not be evaluated.
    Hemming K; Girling A; Martin J; Bond SJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1058-9. PubMed ID: 23849737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Response to Keriel-Gascou et al.: higher efficiency and other alleged advantages are not inherent to the stepped wedge design.
    Viechtbauer W; Kotz D; Spigt M; Arts IC; Crutzen R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 67(7):834-6. PubMed ID: 24786595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Efficiency loss due to varying cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials and how to compensate for it: comment on You et al. (2011).
    van Breukelen GJ; Candel MJ
    Clin Trials; 2012 Feb; 9(1):125; author reply 126-7. PubMed ID: 22334469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.