115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2403604)
1. How many patients are necessary to assess test performance?
Arkin CF; Wachtel MS
JAMA; 1990 Jan; 263(2):275-8. PubMed ID: 2403604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical methodology: I. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity.
Buderer NM
Acad Emerg Med; 1996 Sep; 3(9):895-900. PubMed ID: 8870764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficient study designs to assess the accuracy of screening tests.
Irwig L; Glasziou PP; Berry G; Chock C; Mock P; Simpson JM
Am J Epidemiol; 1994 Oct; 140(8):759-69. PubMed ID: 7942777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Assessment of research methodology on diagnostic laboratory test in Revista Clínica Española and Medicina Clínica].
Lumbreras Lacarra B; Ramos Rincón JM; Hernández Aguado I
Rev Clin Esp; 2004 Sep; 204(9):472-6. PubMed ID: 15388021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Linearity evaluation of analytical methods that count particles.
Magari RT; Rodriguez L
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004 Feb; 42(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 15061364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement performance goals: how they can be estimated and a view to managing them.
Kallner A
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 2010; 242():34-9. PubMed ID: 20515274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistical evaluation of test accuracy studies for Toxoplasma gondii in food animal intermediate hosts.
Gardner IA; Greiner M; Dubey JP
Zoonoses Public Health; 2010 Feb; 57(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 19744298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics.
Hajian-Tilaki K
J Biomed Inform; 2014 Apr; 48():193-204. PubMed ID: 24582925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of calculation methods for diagnostic trials under different sample size].
Wang Y; Hu B; Chen T; Li W
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 31(12):1403-5. PubMed ID: 21223674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pediatricians' diagnostic approach to pharyngitis and impact of CLIA 1988 on office diagnostic tests.
Schwartz B; Fries S; Fitzgibbon AM; Lipman H
JAMA; 1994 Jan; 271(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 8277551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acceptance sampling based on truncated life tests in the Birnbaum Saunders model.
Baklizi A; El Qader El Masri A
Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1453-7. PubMed ID: 15660603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sample size for comparing correlated concordance rates.
Jung SH; Barnhart HX; Sohn I; Stinnett SS; Wallace DK
J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(2):359-69. PubMed ID: 18327726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analytical method transfer: improving interpretability with ratio-based statistical approaches.
Frömke C; Hothorn LA; Sczesny F; Onken J; Schneider M
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2013 Feb; 74():186-93. PubMed ID: 23245250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using samples to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of a surveillance process.
McBryde ES; Kelly H; Marshall C; Russo PL; McElwain DL; Pettitt AN
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 29(6):559-63. PubMed ID: 18510466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the performance of two spontaneous sedimentation techniques for the diagnosis of human intestinal parasites in the absence of a gold standard.
Gonçalves AQ; Abellana R; Pereira-da-Silva HD; Santos I; Serra PT; Julião GR; Orlandi PP; Ascaso C
Acta Trop; 2014 Mar; 131():63-70. PubMed ID: 24321383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A system to monitor a portion of the total testing process in medical clinics and laboratories: feasibility of a split-specimen design.
Shahangian S; Krolak JM; Gaunt EE; Cohn RD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):503-11. PubMed ID: 9625417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal sample sizes for Welch's test under various allocation and cost considerations.
Jan SL; Shieh G
Behav Res Methods; 2011 Dec; 43(4):1014-22. PubMed ID: 21512873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Homogeneity test of difference between two correlated proportions in stratified matched-pair studies.
Tang NS; Zhang B; Li HQ
J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(6):1261-80. PubMed ID: 24138431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of diagnostic accuracy as a metric for evaluating laboratory proficiency with microarray assays using mixed-tissue RNA reference samples.
Pine PS; Boedigheimer M; Rosenzweig BA; Turpaz Y; He YD; Delenstarr G; Ganter B; Jarnagin K; Jones WD; Reid LH; Thompson KL
Pharmacogenomics; 2008 Nov; 9(11):1753-63. PubMed ID: 19018728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayesian sample size for diagnostic test studies in the absence of a gold standard: Comparing identifiable with non-identifiable models.
Dendukuri N; Bélisle P; Joseph L
Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(26):2688-97. PubMed ID: 20803558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
