BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24037349)

  • 1. Differences between h-index measures from different bibliographic sources and search engines.
    Barreto ML; Aragão E; Sousa LE; Santana TM; Barata RB
    Rev Saude Publica; 2013 Apr; 47(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 24037349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Google Scholar and the h-index in biomedicine: the popularization of bibliometric assessment].
    Cabezas-Clavijo A; Delgado-López-Cózar E
    Med Intensiva; 2013; 37(5):343-54. PubMed ID: 23517697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing.
    De Groote SL; Raszewski R
    Nurs Outlook; 2012; 60(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 22748758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of the Hirsch index in benchmarking hepatic surgery research.
    Cucchetti A; Mazzotti F; Pellegrini S; Cescon M; Maroni L; Ercolani G; Pinna AD
    Am J Surg; 2013 Oct; 206(4):560-6. PubMed ID: 23806828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The h-index outperforms other bibliometrics in the assessment of research performance in general surgery: a province-wide study.
    Sharma B; Boet S; Grantcharov T; Shin E; Barrowman NJ; Bould MD
    Surgery; 2013 Apr; 153(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 23465942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals.
    Kulkarni AV; Aziz B; Shams I; Busse JW
    JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(10):1092-6. PubMed ID: 19738094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bibliographic characteristics of the research output of pediatric anesthesiologists in Canada.
    O'Leary JD; Crawford MW
    Can J Anaesth; 2010 Jun; 57(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 20229218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Profile and scientific production of the Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) researchers in the field of Hematology/Oncology.
    Oliveira MC; Martelli DR; Quirino IG; Colosimo EA; Silva AC; Martelli Júnior H; Oliveira EA
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2014; 60(6):542-7. PubMed ID: 25650854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Productivity of CNPq Researchers from Different Fields in Biomedical Sciences: The Need for Objective Bibliometric Parameters-A Report from Brazil.
    Kamdem JP; Roos DH; Sanmi AA; Calabró L; Abolaji AO; de Oliveira CS; Barros LM; Duarte AE; Barbosa NV; Souza DO; Rocha JBT
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1037-1055. PubMed ID: 29404974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Scientific research and academic promotion in occupational medicine: what are the rules of the game?].
    Franco G
    Med Lav; 2011; 102(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 21485054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The challenge of assessing the impact of science beyond bibliometrics.
    Barreto ML
    Rev Saude Publica; 2013 Aug; 47(4):834-7. PubMed ID: 24346673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Publish or Perish" as citation metrics used to analyze scientific output in the humanities: International case studies in economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy, and history.
    Baneyx A
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(6):363-71. PubMed ID: 19043670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific publishing. Google Scholar wins raves--but can it be trusted?
    Bohannon J
    Science; 2014 Jan; 343(6166):14. PubMed ID: 24385613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A scientometric view of Revista Médica de Chile].
    Krauskopf M; Krauskopf E
    Rev Med Chil; 2008 Aug; 136(8):1065-72. PubMed ID: 18949193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Profile and scientific output of researchers recipients of CNPq productivity grant in the field of medicine.
    Martelli DR; Oliveira MCL; Pinheiro SV; Santos ML; Dias V; Silva ACSE; Martelli-Júnior H; Oliveira EA
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2019 Jun; 65(5):682-690. PubMed ID: 31166446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to use bibliometric methods in evaluation of scientific research? An example from Finnish schizophrenia research.
    Koskinen J; Isohanni M; Paajala H; Jääskeläinen E; Nieminen P; Koponen H; Tienari P; Miettunen J
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2008; 62(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 18569777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does open access in ophthalmology affect how articles are subsequently cited in research?
    Lansingh VC; Carter MJ
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Aug; 116(8):1425-31. PubMed ID: 19545905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Breast pathology: evaluation of the Portuguese scientific activity based on bibliometric indicators].
    Donato HM; De Oliveira CF
    Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 17234084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Confusing the confused: thoughts on impact factor, h(irsch) index, Q value, and other cofactors that influence the researcher's happiness].
    Quindós G
    Rev Iberoam Micol; 2009 Jun; 26(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 19631157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the impact of paediatric oncology publications using three citation databases.
    Arora RS; Eden TO
    Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2011 Jan; 56(1):152-3. PubMed ID: 20922764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.