These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24038514)
1. Inducible displacements of the cup and the femoral head during active range of motion: dynamic RSA studies of cemented total hip replacements. Digas G; Johansson PE; Kärrholm J J Orthop Res; 2013 Nov; 31(11):1686-93. PubMed ID: 24038514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters. Digas G Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion. Girard J; Krantz N; Bocquet D; Wavreille G; Migaud H Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Feb; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of model-based radiostereometric analysis to measure femoral head penetration and cup migration in four different cup designs. Shareghi B; Johanson PE; Kärrholm J J Orthop Res; 2017 Apr; 35(4):760-767. PubMed ID: 26825861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Pelvic Tilt and Femoral Head Size on Hip Range-of-Motion to Impingement. McCarthy TF; Nevelos J; Elmallah RK; Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Alipit V; Wagner TC; Mont MA J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3544-3549. PubMed ID: 28712801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Cementless socket fixation based on the "press-fit" concept in total hip joint arthroplasty]. Morscher EW; Widmer KH; Bereiter H; Elke R; Schenk R Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of results after reimplantation of total hip arthroplasty cemented cup]. Dzupa V; Cech O; Pacovský V; Pazdírek P Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15069860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone]. Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements. Yoshimine F J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 15894324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation of different fixation principles. Thanner J Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1999 Aug; 286():1-41. PubMed ID: 10572504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Total hip arthroplasty with uncemented cup and femoral head autografts for coxarthrosis due to dysplasia]. Wu LD; Xiong Y; Yan SG; Yang QS; He RX; Wang QH Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Aug; 42(16):1006-9. PubMed ID: 15363240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Results of the Evora dual-mobility socket after a minimum follow-up of five years. Leclercq S; Benoit JY; de Rosa JP; Euvrard P; Leteurtre C; Girardin P Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Dec; 94(8):e17-22. PubMed ID: 19070709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A forty millimetre head significantly improves range of motion compared with a twenty eight millimetre head in total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system. Tsuda K; Haraguchi K; Koyanagi J; Takahashi S; Sugama R; Fujiwara K Int Orthop; 2016 Oct; 40(10):2031-2039. PubMed ID: 26780716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter. Kluess D; Zietz C; Lindner T; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19085490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The 22-mm vs the 32-mm femoral head in cemented primary hip arthroplasty long-term clinical and radiological follow-up study. Shaju KA; Hasan ST; D'Souza LG; McMahon B; Masterson EL J Arthroplasty; 2005 Oct; 20(7):903-8. PubMed ID: 16230243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach. Kessler O; Patil S; Wirth S; Mayr E; Colwell CW; D'Lima DD J Orthop Res; 2008 Apr; 26(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 18050356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Femur first in hip arthroplasty--the concept of combined anteversion]. Sendtner E; Müller M; Winkler R; Wörner M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Mar; 148(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 20376760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone. Yoshimine F J Biomech; 2005 Jan; 38(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 15519347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head]. Celebi L; Muratli HH; Akşahin E; Yağmurlu MF; Yüksel HY; Biçimoğlu A Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2006; 40(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 16757925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acetabular alignment and primary arc of motion for minus, skirtless, and skirted 28-, 32-, 36-, and 40-mm femoral heads. Kosashvili Y; Omoto D; Backstein D; Safir O; Lakstein D; Gross AE J Arthroplasty; 2013 Feb; 28(2):279-285.e2. PubMed ID: 22854347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]