130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24038529)
1. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the high-risk breast: Apparent diffusion coefficient values and their relationship to breast density.
O'Flynn EA; Wilson RM; Allen SD; Locke I; Scurr E; deSouza NM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Apr; 39(4):805-11. PubMed ID: 24038529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of breast masses as benign or malignant at 3.0T MRI with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
Suo S; Zhang K; Cao M; Suo X; Hua J; Geng X; Chen J; Zhuang Z; Ji X; Lu Q; Wang H; Xu J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 26343918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diffusion-weighted imaging: Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for detecting pathologic complete response to chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.
Choi MH; Oh SN; Rha SE; Choi JI; Lee SH; Jang HS; Kim JG; Grimm R; Son Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 44(1):212-20. PubMed ID: 26666560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Apparent diffusion coefficient of breast cancer and normal fibroglandular tissue in diffusion-weighted imaging: the effects of menstrual cycle and menopausal status.
Kim JY; Suh HB; Kang HJ; Shin JK; Choo KS; Nam KJ; Lee SW; Jung YL; Bae YT
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 May; 157(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 27091644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values.
Pereira FP; Martins G; Figueiredo E; Domingues MN; Domingues RC; da Fonseca LM; Gasparetto EL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1030-5. PubMed ID: 19770326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping as a quantitative imaging biomarker for prediction of immunohistochemical receptor status, proliferation rate, and molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
Horvat JV; Bernard-Davila B; Helbich TH; Zhang M; Morris EA; Thakur SB; Ochoa-Albiztegui RE; Leithner D; Marino MA; Baltzer PA; Clauser P; Kapetas P; Bago-Horvath Z; Pinker K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 50(3):836-846. PubMed ID: 30811717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging for monitoring breast cancer treatment response.
Wilmes LJ; McLaughlin RL; Newitt DC; Singer L; Sinha SP; Proctor E; Wisner DJ; Saritas EU; Kornak J; Shankaranarayanan A; Banerjee S; Jones EF; Joe BN; Hylton NM
Acad Radiol; 2013 May; 20(5):581-9. PubMed ID: 23570936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.
Cakir O; Arslan A; Inan N; Anık Y; Sarısoy T; Gumustas S; Akansel G
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e801-6. PubMed ID: 24099642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diffusion weighted imaging of the normal breast: reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements and variation with menstrual cycle and menopausal status.
O'Flynn EA; Morgan VA; Giles SL; deSouza NM
Eur Radiol; 2012 Jul; 22(7):1512-8. PubMed ID: 22367471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging in the differentiation of malignant from benign breast lesions.
Liu W; Wei C; Bai J; Gao X; Zhou L
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Aug; 117():156-163. PubMed ID: 31307642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI.
Liu C; Liang C; Liu Z; Zhang S; Huang B
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e782-9. PubMed ID: 24034833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproducibility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements in Malignant Breast Masses.
Jang M; Kim SM; Yun BL; Ahn HS; Kim SY; Kang E; Kim SW
J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1689-97. PubMed ID: 26539016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tumor apparent diffusion coefficient as an imaging biomarker to predict tumor aggressiveness in patients with estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer.
Shin HJ; Kim SH; Lee HJ; Gong G; Baek S; Chae EY; Choi WJ; Cha JH; Kim HH
NMR Biomed; 2016 Aug; 29(8):1070-8. PubMed ID: 27332719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diffusion-weighted imaging and (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer: Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient and maximum standardized uptake values with prognostic factors.
Karan B; Pourbagher A; Torun N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 26663655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment and quantification of sources of variability in breast apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements at diffusion weighted imaging.
Giannotti E; Waugh S; Priba L; Davis Z; Crowe E; Vinnicombe S
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1729-36. PubMed ID: 26078100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient values in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Çabuk G; Nass Duce M; Özgür A; Apaydın FD; Polat A; Orekici G
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 59(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 25564776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of parallel diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map values for evaluating breast lesions: preliminary results.
Jin G; An N; Jacobs MA; Li K
Acad Radiol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):456-63. PubMed ID: 20207316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diffusion-weighted imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in correlation with histologic findings.
Woodhams R; Kakita S; Hata H; Iwabuchi K; Umeoka S; Mountford CE; Hatabu H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 193(1):260-6. PubMed ID: 19542422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-small cell lung cancer: Whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient for assessment of tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion and pleural invasion.
Tsuchiya N; Doai M; Usuda K; Uramoto H; Tonami H
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172433. PubMed ID: 28207858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in endometrial carcinoma: effect of region of interest methods on ADC values.
Inoue C; Fujii S; Kaneda S; Fukunaga T; Kaminou T; Kigawa J; Harada T; Ogawa T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 40(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 24677497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
