These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Background-matching and disruptive coloration, and the evolution of cryptic coloration. Merilaita S; Lind J Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Mar; 272(1563):665-70. PubMed ID: 15817442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finding a signal hidden among noise: how can predators overcome camouflage strategies? Galloway JAM; Green SD; Stevens M; Kelley LA Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Jul; 375(1802):20190478. PubMed ID: 32420842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Generalist camouflage can be more successful than microhabitat specialisation in natural environments. Briolat ES; Arenas LM; Hughes AE; Liggins E; Stevens M BMC Ecol Evol; 2021 Aug; 21(1):151. PubMed ID: 34344323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration. Stevens M Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Jun; 274(1617):1457-64. PubMed ID: 17426012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantifying camouflage: how to predict detectability from appearance. Troscianko J; Skelhorn J; Stevens M BMC Evol Biol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):7. PubMed ID: 28056761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing Thayer's hypothesis: can camouflage work by distraction? Stevens M; Graham J; Winney IS; Cantor A Biol Lett; 2008 Dec; 4(6):648-50. PubMed ID: 18842567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Concealed by conspicuousness: distractive prey markings and backgrounds. Dimitrova M; Stobbe N; Schaefer HM; Merilaita S Proc Biol Sci; 2009 May; 276(1663):1905-10. PubMed ID: 19324754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Background matching and disruptive coloration as habitat-specific strategies for camouflage. Price N; Green S; Troscianko J; Tregenza T; Stevens M Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):7840. PubMed ID: 31127182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]