These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24040046)

  • 1. Defeating crypsis: detection and learning of camouflage strategies.
    Troscianko J; Lown AE; Hughes AE; Stevens M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e73733. PubMed ID: 24040046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Camouflage strategies interfere differently with observer search images.
    Troscianko J; Skelhorn J; Stevens M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Sep; 285(1886):. PubMed ID: 30185636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching.
    Schaefer HM; Stobbe N
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Oct; 273(1600):2427-32. PubMed ID: 16959631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predator responses to prey camouflage strategies: a meta-analysis.
    de Alcantara Viana JV; Vieira C; Duarte RC; Romero GQ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Sep; 289(1982):20220980. PubMed ID: 36100020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Background-matching and disruptive coloration, and the evolution of cryptic coloration.
    Merilaita S; Lind J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Mar; 272(1563):665-70. PubMed ID: 15817442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finding a signal hidden among noise: how can predators overcome camouflage strategies?
    Galloway JAM; Green SD; Stevens M; Kelley LA
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Jul; 375(1802):20190478. PubMed ID: 32420842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generalist camouflage can be more successful than microhabitat specialisation in natural environments.
    Briolat ES; Arenas LM; Hughes AE; Liggins E; Stevens M
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2021 Aug; 21(1):151. PubMed ID: 34344323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration.
    Stevens M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Jun; 274(1617):1457-64. PubMed ID: 17426012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying camouflage: how to predict detectability from appearance.
    Troscianko J; Skelhorn J; Stevens M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):7. PubMed ID: 28056761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disruptive camouflage impairs object recognition.
    Webster RJ; Hassall C; Herdman CM; Godin JG; Sherratt TN
    Biol Lett; 2013; 9(6):20130501. PubMed ID: 24152693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing Thayer's hypothesis: can camouflage work by distraction?
    Stevens M; Graham J; Winney IS; Cantor A
    Biol Lett; 2008 Dec; 4(6):648-50. PubMed ID: 18842567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Concealed by conspicuousness: distractive prey markings and backgrounds.
    Dimitrova M; Stobbe N; Schaefer HM; Merilaita S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 May; 276(1663):1905-10. PubMed ID: 19324754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Background matching and disruptive coloration as habitat-specific strategies for camouflage.
    Price N; Green S; Troscianko J; Tregenza T; Stevens M
    Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):7840. PubMed ID: 31127182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Camouflage in predators.
    Pembury Smith MQR; Ruxton GD
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2020 Oct; 95(5):1325-1340. PubMed ID: 32410297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Camouflage using three-dimensional surface disruption.
    King J; Hemmi JM; Kelley JL
    Biol Lett; 2023 Aug; 19(8):20220596. PubMed ID: 37528728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal background matching camouflage.
    Michalis C; Scott-Samuel NE; Gibson DP; Cuthill IC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Jul; 284(1858):. PubMed ID: 28701559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variable crab camouflage patterns defeat search image formation.
    Troscianko J; Nokelainen O; Skelhorn J; Stevens M
    Commun Biol; 2021 Mar; 4(1):287. PubMed ID: 33674781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Empirical tests of the role of disruptive coloration in reducing detectability.
    Fraser S; Callahan A; Klassen D; Sherratt TN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 May; 274(1615):1325-31. PubMed ID: 17360282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disruptive contrast in animal camouflage.
    Stevens M; Cuthill IC; Windsor AM; Walker HJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Oct; 273(1600):2433-8. PubMed ID: 16959632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Motion dazzle and camouflage as distinct anti-predator defenses.
    Stevens M; Searle WT; Seymour JE; Marshall KL; Ruxton GD
    BMC Biol; 2011 Nov; 9():81. PubMed ID: 22117898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.