These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2404106)

  • 1. Study of the accuracy of different recording materials.
    Müller J; Götz G; Hörz W; Kraft E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 2404106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An experimental study on the influence of the derived casts on the accuracy of different recording materials. Part I: Plaster, impression compound, and wax.
    Müller J; Götz G; Hörz W; Kraft E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Mar; 63(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 2308087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An experimental study on the influence of the derived casts on the accuracy of different recording materials. Part II: Polyether, acrylic resin, and corrected wax wafer.
    Müller J; Götz G; Hörz W; Kraft E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Apr; 63(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 2329538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An experimental study of vertical deviations induced by different interocclusal recording materials.
    Müller J; Götz G; Bruckner G; Kraft E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jan; 65(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 2033543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Materials for interocclusal records and their ability to reproduce a 3-dimensional jaw relationship.
    Ockert-Eriksson G; Eriksson A; Lockowandt P; Eriksson O
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11203625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of three interocclusal recording materials used to mount a working cast.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL; Kinderknecht KE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Mar; 71(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 8164168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of three types of interocclusal recording materials-an in-vitro multi-centre study.
    Tejo SK; Kumar AG; Kattimani VS; Desai PD; Nalla S; Chaitanya K K
    Head Face Med; 2012 Oct; 8():27. PubMed ID: 23039395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An In Vitro Study of Condylar Displacement Caused by Interocclusal Records: Influence of Recording Material, Storage Time, and Recording Technique.
    Ghazal M; Hedderich J; Kern M
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):587-593. PubMed ID: 26833815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of laminated wax interocclusal wafers.
    Millstein PL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Oct; 54(4):574-7. PubMed ID: 3862816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical factors and clinical variation influencing the reproducibility of interocclusal recording methods.
    Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P; Eriksson O
    Br Dent J; 2002 Apr; 192(7):395-400; discussion 391. PubMed ID: 12017459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An easy technique to obtain articulated casts using the palate for the interocclusal record.
    Rodrigues DM; Fernandes FH; Orsi IA; Bezzon OL
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Apr; 19(3):245-6. PubMed ID: 20180899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of 5 types of interocclusal recording materials on the accuracy of articulation of digital models.
    Sweeney S; Smith DK; Messersmith M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 26232833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential accuracy of elastomeric recording materials and associated weight change.
    Millstein PL; Hsu CC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Apr; 71(4):400-3. PubMed ID: 8196007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of interocclusal recording for mandibular removable partial denture in bilateral distal extension cases.
    Togano H; Hideshima M; Ohyama T
    J Med Dent Sci; 2003 Mar; 50(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12715920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interocclusal record fabricated with bis-acrylic composite resin and vinyl polysiloxane registration material.
    Vivas JL; Sierraalta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):199-200. PubMed ID: 19703631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compressibility of two polyvinyl siloxane interocclusal record materials and its effect on mounted cast relationships.
    Campos AA; Nathanson D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Oct; 82(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 10512966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal recording materials.
    Fattore L; Malone WF; Sandrik JL; Mazur B; Hart T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Feb; 51(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 6366202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The representation of interocclusal record materials to dentate patients. Critical study on dental casts].
    Murakami M; Itoh H; Yoneda M; Higashi H; Yoshida M; Kawano J
    Gifu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Aug; 11(1):170-80. PubMed ID: 6582128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One-step mounting of diagnostic casts demonstrating loss of posterior occlusal support.
    Oh WS; Nguyen P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):276-7. PubMed ID: 22475471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.