These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24041303)

  • 1. Comparing comprehension measured by multiple-choice and open-ended questions.
    Ozuru Y; Briner S; Kurby CA; McNamara DS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Sep; 67(3):215-27. PubMed ID: 24041303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forming a belief: The contribution of comprehension to the evaluation and persuasive impact of argumentative text.
    Diakidoy IA; Christodoulou SA; Floros G; Iordanou K; Kargopoulos PV
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2015 Sep; 85(3):300-15. PubMed ID: 25824097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of advance questions on reading comprehension.
    Kreiner DS
    J Gen Psychol; 1996 Oct; 123(4):352-64. PubMed ID: 9042744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does mood influence text processing and comprehension? Evidence from an eye-movement study.
    Scrimin S; Mason L
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2015 Sep; 85(3):387-406. PubMed ID: 26010020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of language knowledge and test components on reading comprehension scores.
    Collins AA; Lindström ER; Sandbank M
    Ann Dyslexia; 2021 Jul; 71(2):238-259. PubMed ID: 33439433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of seductive details evidenced by gaze duration.
    Chang Y; Choi S
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2014 Mar; 109():131-8. PubMed ID: 24445112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Memory-based processing as a mechanism of automaticity in text comprehension.
    Rawson KA; Middleton EL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):353-70. PubMed ID: 19271851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Passageless comprehension on the Nelson-Denny reading test: well above chance for university students.
    Coleman C; Lindstrom J; Nelson J; Lindstrom W; Gregg KN
    J Learn Disabil; 2010; 43(3):244-9. PubMed ID: 19933897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving text recall with multiple summaries.
    van der Meij H; van der Meij J
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2012 Jun; 82(Pt 2):257-69. PubMed ID: 22583090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Should essays and other "open-ended"-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine?
    Hift RJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Nov; 14():249. PubMed ID: 25431359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition.
    Zaromb FM; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):552-7. PubMed ID: 20192550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Harmful effects of preexisting inappropriate highlighting on reading comprehension and metacognitive accuracy.
    Gier VS; Kreiner DS; Natz-Gonzalez A
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Jul; 136(3):287-300. PubMed ID: 19650523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The conceptual representation of number.
    Patson ND; George G; Warren T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1349-65. PubMed ID: 24251989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examining reading comprehension text and question answering time differences in university students with and without a history of reading difficulties.
    Hebert M; Zhang X; Parrila R
    Ann Dyslexia; 2018 Apr; 68(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 29150819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Construction and validation of an instrument to assess the reading comprehension of students from the third to the fifth grades of elementary school.
    Cunha VL; Capellini SA
    Codas; 2014; 26(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 24714856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Processing and memory of information presented in narrative or expository texts.
    Wolfe MB; Woodwyk JM
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2010 Sep; 80(Pt 3):341-62. PubMed ID: 20128958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strategic Decisions in Task-Oriented Reading.
    Salmerón L; Vidal-Abarca E; Martínez T; Mañá A; Gil L; Naumann J
    Span J Psychol; 2015 Dec; 18():E102. PubMed ID: 26707969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring dynamic assessment as a means of identifying children at risk of developing comprehension difficulties.
    Elleman AM; Compton DL; Fuchs D; Fuchs LS; Bouton B
    J Learn Disabil; 2011; 44(4):348-57. PubMed ID: 21685351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of text cohesion on the persuasive power of expository text.
    Kaakinen JK; Salonen J; Venäläinen P; Hyönä J
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Jun; 52(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 21265860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Vocabulary Intervention on Text Comprehension: Who Benefits?
    Duff D
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2019 Oct; 50(4):562-578. PubMed ID: 31600473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.