These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Art as a scientific object: toward a visual science of art. Pinna B Spat Vis; 2007; 20(6):493-508. PubMed ID: 18073043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An fMRI study of the reverse perspective illusion. Hayashi T; Umeda C; Cook ND Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 1163():72-8. PubMed ID: 17631871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of mirror reflections and planar rotations of pictures on the shape percept of the depicted object. Cornelis EV; van Doorn AJ; Wagemans J Perception; 2009; 38(10):1439-66. PubMed ID: 19950478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Depth perception in linear and inverse perspective pictures. Topper DR; Simpson WA Perception; 1981; 10(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 7329753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hemispheric specialization for the visual control of action is independent of handedness. Gonzalez CL; Ganel T; Goodale MA J Neurophysiol; 2006 Jun; 95(6):3496-501. PubMed ID: 16495359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pictorial depth and related constancy effects as a function of recognition. Rock I; Shallo J; Schwartz F Perception; 1978; 7(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 628579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual dissociation: an illusory conjunction of pictures and forms. Intraub H J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1985 Aug; 11(4):431-42. PubMed ID: 3161985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Independent effects of pictorial displays on perception and action. Haffenden AM; Goodale MA Vision Res; 2000; 40(10-12):1597-607. PubMed ID: 10788660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Knowledge in perception and illusion. Gregory RL Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1997 Aug; 352(1358):1121-7. PubMed ID: 9304679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Commonality of neural representations of words and pictures. Shinkareva SV; Malave VL; Mason RA; Mitchell TM; Just MA Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(3):2418-25. PubMed ID: 20974270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computational analyses for illusory transformations in the optic flow field and heading perception in the presence of moving objects. Hanada M Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(6):749-58. PubMed ID: 15639501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes. Smeets JB; Brenner E; de Grave DD; Cuijpers RH Exp Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 147(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 12410328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Under the carpet. Gregory RL Perception; 1994; 23(7):741-4. PubMed ID: 7845765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus online control. Danckert JA; Sharif N; Haffenden AM; Schiff KC; Goodale MA Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 12012166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Interpretation of discrete phenomena as continuous in the visual system]. Kontsevich LL Fiziol Cheloveka; 1987; 13(5):773-8. PubMed ID: 3692047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Phenomenal causality: impressions of pulling in the visual perception of objects in motion. White PA; Milne A Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(4):573-602. PubMed ID: 9479748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Visual impression of photographic density of the brain in head CT images: verification of optical illusion by visual subjective evaluation of medical images]. Henmi S Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Oct; 58(10):1383-92. PubMed ID: 12540766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]