These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24041330)

  • 1. The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.
    Farris-Trimble A; McMurray B; Cigrand N; Tomblin JB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):308-27. PubMed ID: 24041330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.
    McMurray B; Farris-Trimble A; Seedorff M; Rigler H
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):e37-51. PubMed ID: 26317298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lexical Access Changes Based on Listener Needs: Real-Time Word Recognition in Continuous Speech in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Smith FX; McMurray B
    Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1487-1501. PubMed ID: 35067570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Waiting for lexical access: Cochlear implants or severely degraded input lead listeners to process speech less incrementally.
    McMurray B; Farris-Trimble A; Rigler H
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():147-164. PubMed ID: 28917133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Delayed Lexical Access and Cascading Effects on Spreading Semantic Activation During Spoken Word Recognition in Children With Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.
    Klein KE; Walker EA; McMurray B
    Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):338-357. PubMed ID: 36253909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How Do You Deal With Uncertainty? Cochlear Implant Users Differ in the Dynamics of Lexical Processing of Noncanonical Inputs.
    McMurray B; Ellis TP; Apfelbaum KS
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):961-980. PubMed ID: 30531260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
    Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonverbal Reasoning as a Contributor to Sentence Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Cochlear Implants.
    Mattingly JK; Castellanos I; Moberly AC
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec; 39(10):e956-e963. PubMed ID: 30444843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual Differences in Lexical Access Among Cochlear Implant Users.
    Nagels L; Bastiaanse R; Başkent D; Wagner A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jan; 63(1):286-304. PubMed ID: 31855606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gated Word Recognition by Postlingually Deafened Adults With Cochlear Implants: Influence of Semantic Context.
    Patro C; Mendel LL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 61(1):145-158. PubMed ID: 29242894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling open-set spoken word recognition in postlingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: some preliminary results with the neighborhood activation model.
    Meyer TA; Frisch SA; Pisoni DB; Miyamoto RT; Svirsky MA
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jul; 24(4):612-20. PubMed ID: 12851554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
    Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low-frequency fine-structure cues allow for the online use of lexical stress during spoken-word recognition in spectrally degraded speech.
    Kong YY; Jesse A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):373. PubMed ID: 28147573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of vowel length, word stress, and compound words and phrases by postlingually deafened cochlear implant listeners.
    Morris D; Magnusson L; Faulkner A; Jönsson R; Juul H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):879-90. PubMed ID: 24224994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-Modal and Intra-Modal Characteristics of Visual Function and Speech Perception Performance in Postlingually Deafened, Cochlear Implant Users.
    Kim MB; Shim HY; Jin SH; Kang S; Woo J; Han JC; Lee JY; Kim M; Cho YS; Moon IJ; Hong SH
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148466. PubMed ID: 26848755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spoken word recognition by eye.
    Auer ET
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):419-25. PubMed ID: 19778389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: "Perceptual Attention" Versus "Auditory Sensitivity".
    Moberly AC; Lowenstein JH; Nittrouer S
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26301844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech Production Quality of Cochlear Implant Users with Respect to Duration and Onset of Hearing Loss.
    Ruff S; Bocklet T; Nöth E; Müller J; Hoster E; Schuster M
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2017; 79(5):282-294. PubMed ID: 29131113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.