464 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24041344)
1. Cost-utility of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared to conventional total hip replacement in young active patients with osteoarthritis.
Heintzbergen S; Kulin NA; Ijzerman MJ; Steuten LM; Werle J; Khong H; Marshall DA
Value Health; 2013; 16(6):942-52. PubMed ID: 24041344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do the potential benefits of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing justify the increased cost and risk of complications?
Bozic KJ; Pui CM; Ludeman MJ; Vail TP; Silverstein MD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 468(9):2301-12. PubMed ID: 20232182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.
Rampersaud YR; Tso P; Walker KR; Lewis SJ; Davey JR; Mahomed NN; Coyte PC
Spine J; 2014 Feb; 14(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 24239803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip.
Chang RW; Pellisier JM; Hazen GB
JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(11):858-65. PubMed ID: 8596224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Cost-Effectiveness of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients 80 Years of Age and Older.
Kunkel ST; Sabatino MJ; Kang R; Jevsevar DS; Moschetti WE
J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1359-1367. PubMed ID: 29276115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Large diameter metal on metal articulations. Comparison of total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Jack CM; Walter WL; Shimmin AJ; Cashman K; de Steiger RN
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Apr; 28(4):650-3. PubMed ID: 23140992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients-a minimum of five year follow-up.
Tao R; Liu F; Liu YK; Lu Y; Xu H; Cao Y; Zhou ZY; Wang W
Int Orthop; 2018 Oct; 42(10):2323-2327. PubMed ID: 29455347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short-term complications have more effect on cost-effectiveness of THA than implant longevity.
Shearer DW; Youm J; Bozic KJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 May; 473(5):1702-8. PubMed ID: 25560958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total hip replacement and surface replacement for the treatment of pain and disability resulting from end-stage arthritis of the hip (review of technology appraisal guidance 2 and 44): systematic review and economic evaluation.
Clarke A; Pulikottil-Jacob R; Grove A; Freeman K; Mistry H; Tsertsvadze A; Connock M; Court R; Kandala NB; Costa M; Suri G; Metcalfe D; Crowther M; Morrow S; Johnson S; Sutcliffe P
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jan; 19(10):1-668, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 25634033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-Effectiveness of Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Nonoperative Management in Normal, Overweight, Obese, Severely Obese, Morbidly Obese, and Super Obese Patients: A Markov Model.
Ponnusamy KE; Vasarhelyi EM; McCalden RW; Somerville LE; Marsh JD
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Dec; 33(12):3629-3636. PubMed ID: 30266324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Economic Impact of Acetabular Labral Tears: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis Comparing Hip Arthroscopic Surgery and Structured Rehabilitation Alone in Patients Without Osteoarthritis.
Lodhia P; Gui C; Chandrasekaran S; Suarez-Ahedo C; Dirschl DR; Domb BG
Am J Sports Med; 2016 Jul; 44(7):1771-80. PubMed ID: 27190068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating the Societal Benefits of THA After Accounting for Work Status and Productivity: A Markov Model Approach.
Koenig L; Zhang Q; Austin MS; Demiralp B; Fehring TK; Feng C; Mather RC; Nguyen JT; Saavoss A; Springer BD; Yates AJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Dec; 474(12):2645-2654. PubMed ID: 27699631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Cost-Effectiveness of Dual Mobility Implants for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Computer-Based Cost-Utility Model.
Barlow BT; McLawhorn AS; Westrich GH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(9):768-777. PubMed ID: 28463921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of early versus late total hip replacement in Italy.
Mota RE
Value Health; 2013; 16(2):267-79. PubMed ID: 23538178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prolonged enoxaparin therapy to prevent venous thromboembolism after primary hip or knee replacement. A cost-utility analysis.
Haentjens P; De Groote K; Annemans L
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Oct; 124(8):507-17. PubMed ID: 15365714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Poor 10-year survivorship of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Seppänen M; Karvonen M; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Liukas A; Mäkelä KT
Acta Orthop; 2016 Dec; 87(6):554-559. PubMed ID: 27759474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inferior outcome after hip resurfacing arthroplasty than after conventional arthroplasty. Evidence from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database, 1995 to 2007.
Johanson PE; Fenstad AM; Furnes O; Garellick G; Havelin LI; Overgaard S; Pedersen AB; Kärrholm J
Acta Orthop; 2010 Oct; 81(5):535-41. PubMed ID: 20919812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Has Metal-On-Metal Resurfacing Been a Cost-Effective Intervention for Health Care Providers?-A Registry Based Study.
Pulikottil-Jacob R; Connock M; Kandala NB; Mistry H; Grove A; Freeman K; Costa M; Sutcliffe P; Clarke A
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165021. PubMed ID: 27802289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health state utility in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and total hip arthroplasty.
Bozic KJ; Chiu VW; Slover JD; Immerman I; Kahn JG
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6 Suppl):129-132.e1-2. PubMed ID: 21602023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement used in primary total hip arthroplasty.
Cummins JS; Tomek IM; Kantor SR; Furnes O; Engesaeter LB; Finlayson SR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91(3):634-41. PubMed ID: 19255224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
