BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2404166)

  • 1. Imaging of the breast: techniques and results.
    Gisvold JJ
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1990 Jan; 65(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 2404166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.
    Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH
    Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Analysis of the results of 137 subclinical breast lesions excisions. Value of ultrasonography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Jacob D; Brombart JC; Muller C; Lefèbvre C; Massa F; Depoerck A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9091540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammography in women with axillary lymphadenopathy and normal breasts on physical examination: value in detecting occult breast carcinoma.
    Leibman AJ; Kossoff MB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Sep; 159(3):493-5. PubMed ID: 1503012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?
    Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjaeger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scintimammographic analysis of nonpalpable breast lesions previously identified by conventional mammography.
    Tolmos J; Cutrone JA; Wang B; Vargas HI; Stuntz M; Mishkin FS; Diggles LE; Venegas RJ; Klein SR; Khalkhali I
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Jun; 90(11):846-9. PubMed ID: 9625173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions.
    Soo MS; Rosen EL; Baker JA; Vo TT; Boyd BA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1167-70. PubMed ID: 11641195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
    Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Critical review of 215 cases of non-palpable mammary lesions].
    Pastore G; Marano P; Romani M; Costantini M; Belli P
    Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):344-8. PubMed ID: 10432964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ability of mammography to reveal nonpalpable breast cancer in women with palpable breast masses.
    Rosen EL; Sickles E; Keating D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 9930773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Palpable solid breast masses: retrospective single- and multimodality evaluation of 201 lesions.
    van Dam PA; Van Goethem ML; Kersschot E; Vervliet J; Van den Veyver IB; De Schepper A; Buytaert P
    Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):435-9. PubMed ID: 3275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
    Stomper PC; Gelman RS
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography.
    Hall FM; Storella JM; Silverstone DZ; Wyshak G
    Radiology; 1988 May; 167(2):353-8. PubMed ID: 3282256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technetium-99m-MIBI scintimammography in palpable and nonpalpable breast lesions.
    Mekhmandarov S; Sandbank J; Cohen M; Lelcuk S; Lubin E
    J Nucl Med; 1998 Jan; 39(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 9443742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasonography as adjunct to mammography in the evaluation of breast tumors.
    Skaane P
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1999; 420():1-47. PubMed ID: 10693544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnosis of early breast cancer.
    Homer MJ
    Am Fam Physician; 1981 Feb; 23(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 7457324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of the diagnostic methods on the therapeutic strategies.
    Greco M; Agresti R; Giovanazzi R
    Q J Nucl Med; 1998 Mar; 42(1):66-80. PubMed ID: 9646647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The contribution of ultrasonography to the differential diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Ciatto S; Rosselli del Turco M; Catarzi S; Morrone D
    Neoplasma; 1994; 41(6):341-5. PubMed ID: 7870218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of early breast cancer: an overview and future prospects.
    Zhou XH; Gordon R
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1989; 17(3):203-55. PubMed ID: 2673660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.