These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2404237)

  • 1. Bone densitometry of the axial skeleton.
    Mazess RB
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1990 Jan; 21(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 2404237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement of bone by dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
    Mazess RB; Barden HS
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1988; 77(5-6):197-203. PubMed ID: 3076046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone densitometry: patients receiving prolonged steroid therapy.
    Erlichman M; Holohan TV
    Health Technol Assess (Rockv); 1996 Sep; (9):i-vi, 1-31. PubMed ID: 9059877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography.
    Wang L; Su Y; Wang Q; Duanmu Y; Yang M; Yi C; Cheng X
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):6284. PubMed ID: 28740145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Principle and instruments of bone densitometry].
    Mukai T
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1990 Jan; 35(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 2313925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [DEXA (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) and DPA (dual photon absorptiometry) in densitometry of the femoral neck: correlation of the measurements of three commercially available instruments].
    Hübsch P; Schneider B; Seidl G; Kalchhauser G; Klaushofer K; Popovic R
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jul; 1(4):169-73. PubMed ID: 1911892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of total-body measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and dual-photon absorptiometry.
    Nuti R; Martini G; Righi G; Frediani B; Turchetti V
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Jul; 6(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 1950673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of degenerative spinal changes on the correlation of peripheral and axial bone density.
    Schneider P; Börner W
    Nuklearmedizin; 1994 Aug; 33(4):138-43. PubMed ID: 7971288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanics of fracture risk prediction of the hip and spine by quantitative computed tomography.
    Hayes WC; Piazza SJ; Zysset PK
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1991 Jan; 29(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 1985322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The spine deformity index in osteoporosis is not related to bone mineral and ultrasound measurements.
    Bernecker P; Pietschmann P; Winkelbauer F; Krexner E; Resch H; Willvonseder R
    Br J Radiol; 1992 May; 65(773):393-6. PubMed ID: 1611418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: a precise method of measuring bone mineral density in the lumbar spine.
    Hansen MA; Hassager C; Overgaard K; Marslew U; Riis BJ; Christiansen C
    J Nucl Med; 1990 Jul; 31(7):1156-62. PubMed ID: 2362194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Densitometry in suspected preclinical osteoporosis: quantitative computerized tomography versus dual energy roentgen absorptiometry].
    Frahm C; Link J; Hakelberg K; Weiss HD; Rademaker J
    Bildgebung; 1994 Dec; 61(4):256-62. PubMed ID: 7849467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Osteoporosis: radiologic and nuclear medicine procedures.
    Weissman BN
    Public Health Rep; 1987; 102(4 Suppl):127-31. PubMed ID: 3120210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient doses in bone mineral densitometry.
    Huda W; Morin RL
    Br J Radiol; 1996 May; 69(821):422-5. PubMed ID: 8705180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A comparison of two noninvasive measurement methods for determining central osteoporosis taking into consideration the ash content].
    von Stremple A; Prokopp M; Flindt C
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 8448227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Adaptation of computed tomography and roentgenography to bone density measurements].
    Tatoń G; Korkosz M; Głuszko P; Kuśmiderski J; Rokita E; Urbanik A
    Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(7-8):494-7. PubMed ID: 10575916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of metabolic bone diseases by quantitative computed tomography.
    Richardson ML; Genant HK; Cann CE; Ettinger B; Gordan GS; Kolb FO; Reiser UJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1985 May; (195):224-38. PubMed ID: 3978956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New developments in bone densitometry.
    Genant HK; Steiger P; Glueer CC
    Postgrad Med; 1989 Apr; Spec No():18-22; discussion 33-43. PubMed ID: 2726622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative performance in vitro and in vivo of Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray absorptiometers.
    Laskey MA; Flaxman ME; Barber RW; Trafford S; Hayball MP; Lyttle KD; Crisp AJ; Compston JE
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Nov; 64(767):1023-9. PubMed ID: 1742583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noninvasive axial and peripheral assessment of bone mineral content: a comparison between osteoporotic women and normal subjects.
    Van Berkum FN; Birkenhäger JC; Van Veen LC; Zeelenberg J; Birkenhäger-Frenkel DH; Trouerbach WT; Stijnen T; Pols HA
    J Bone Miner Res; 1989 Oct; 4(5):679-85. PubMed ID: 2816513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.