313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24043128)
1. A cohort study comparing a single-incision sling with a retropubic midurethral sling.
Madsen AM; El-Nashar SA; Woelk JL; Klingele CJ; Gebhart JB; Trabuco EC
Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Mar; 25(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 24043128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.
Schellart RP; Oude Rengerink K; Van der Aa F; Lucot JP; Kimpe B; de Ridder DJ; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1179-85. PubMed ID: 25168619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-incision mini-slings versus standard synthetic mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: The SIMS RCT.
Abdel-Fattah M; Cooper D; Davidson T; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Bhal K; McDonald A; Wardle J; N'Dow J; MacLennan G; Norrie J
Health Technol Assess; 2022 Dec; 26(47):1-190. PubMed ID: 36520097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reoperation for Urinary Incontinence After Retropubic and Transobturator Sling Procedures.
Trabuco EC; Carranza D; El Nashar SA; Weaver AL; McGree ME; Elliott DS; Linder BJ; Occhino J; Gebhart JB; Klingele CJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):333-342. PubMed ID: 31306327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term effectiveness and safety of open Burch colposuspension vs retropubic midurethral sling for stress urinary incontinence-results from a large comparative study.
Karmakar D; Dwyer PL; Murray C; Schierlitz L; Dykes N; Zilberlicht A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):593.e1-593.e8. PubMed ID: 33316277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of single-incision mini-slings (Ajust) and standard transobturator midurethral slings (Align) in the management of female stress urinary incontinence: A 1-year follow-up.
Chang CP; Chang WH; Hsu YM; Chen YJ; Wen KC; Chao KC; Yen MS; Horng HC; Wang PH;
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 54(6):726-30. PubMed ID: 26700993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
Nambiar A; Cody JD; Jeffery ST
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; (6):CD008709. PubMed ID: 24880654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized, nonblinded extension study of single-incision versus transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence.
Schellart RP; Zwolsman SE; Lucot JP; de Ridder DJMK; Dijkgraaf MGW; Roovers JWR
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jan; 29(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 28577171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.
Dogan O; Kaya AE; Pulatoglu C; Basbug A; Yassa M
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Sep; 29(9):1387-1395. PubMed ID: 29549394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomised comparison of single-incision versus traditional transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of a 24-month follow-up.
Schellart RP; Oude Rengerink K; Van der Aa F; Lucot JP; Kimpe B; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jun; 27(6):871-7. PubMed ID: 26670576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Serious complications and recurrences after retropubic vs transobturator midurethral sling procedures for 2682 patients in the VIGI-MESH register.
Armengaud C; Fauconnier A; Drioueche H; Campagne Loiseau S; De Tayrac R; Saussine C; Panel L; Cosson M; Deffieux X; Lucot JP; Pizzoferrato AC; Ferry P; Vidart A; Thubert T; Capon G; Debodinance P; Gauthier T; Koebele A; Salet-Lizee D; Hermieu JF; Game X; Ramanah R; Lamblin G; Lecornet E; Carlier-Guérin C; Chartier-Kastler E; Fritel X
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Apr; 230(4):428.e1-428.e13. PubMed ID: 38008151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Management of female stress urinary incontinence with single-incision mini-sling (Altis®): 36 month multicenter outcomes.
Tu LM; Gheiler E; Hanson CE; Jalkut M; McCrery R; Parekh M; Parva M; Erickson T
Neurourol Urodyn; 2023 Nov; 42(8):1722-1732. PubMed ID: 37555436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized controlled trial comparing single-incision mini-sling and transobturator midurethral sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: 3-year follow-up results.
Pascom ALG; Djehdian LM; Bortolini MAT; Jarmy-Di Bella ZIK; Delroy CA; Tamanini JTN; Castro RA
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Sep; 37(7):2184-2190. PubMed ID: 30088679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-year results from a randomised trial of a retropubic mid-urethral sling versus the Miniarc single incision sling for stress urinary incontinence.
Basu M; Duckett J
Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2059-64. PubMed ID: 23712578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term Risk of Reoperation After Synthetic Mesh Midurethral Sling Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 134(5):1047-1055. PubMed ID: 31599825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new validated score for detecting patient-reported success on postoperative ICIQ-SF: a novel two-stage analysis from two large RCT cohorts.
Karmakar D; Mostafa A; Abdel-Fattah M
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jan; 28(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 27379890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sling Plication for Failed Midurethral Sling Procedures: A Case Series.
Maheshwari D; Jones K; Solomon E; Harmanli O
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):e4-e6. PubMed ID: 30180049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Multicenter Prospective Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of a Single-incision Sling Procedure for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Erickson T; Roovers JP; Gheiler E; Parekh M; Parva M; Hanson C; McCrery R; Tu LM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 32320798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term Rate of Mesh Sling Removal Following Midurethral Mesh Sling Insertion Among Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Gurol-Urganci I; Geary RS; Mamza JB; Duckett J; El-Hamamsy D; Dolan L; Tincello DG; van der Meulen J
JAMA; 2018 Oct; 320(16):1659-1669. PubMed ID: 30357298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study.
Jurakova M; Huser M; Belkov I; Janku P; Hudecek R; Stourac P; Jarkovsky J; Ventruba P
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 May; 27(5):791-6. PubMed ID: 26630947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
