140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24045003)
1. Open Access in biomedical sciences: what the current turning point means more specifically to Oral Oncology contributors and readers.
Cohen E; Chen AY; Ferris RL; Lee A; Bernier J
Oral Oncol; 2013 Oct; 49(10):985-6. PubMed ID: 24045003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Open access: is the scientific quality of biomedical publications threatened?
Barreiro E
Arch Bronconeumol; 2013 Dec; 49(12):505-6. PubMed ID: 24029469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Open access publishing.
Rankin JA; Franklin SG
Emerg Infect Dis; 2004 Jul; 10(7):1352. PubMed ID: 15338570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Publishing biomedical research: roles and responsibilities.
Relman AS
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):23-7. PubMed ID: 2376495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Open access and scientific societies.
Doyle H; Gass A; Kennison R
PLoS Biol; 2004 May; 2(5):E156. PubMed ID: 15138514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Open access will mean peer review will become "the job of the many, not the select few".
Short R
BMJ; 2007 Feb; 334(7589):330. PubMed ID: 17303851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring new frontiers of electronic publishing in biomedical science.
Ng KH
Singapore Med J; 2009 Mar; 50(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 19352562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Open access publishing in the biomedical sciences: could funding agencies accelerate the inevitable changes?
Glover SW; Webb A; Gleghorn C
Health Info Libr J; 2006 Sep; 23(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 16911126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Open access musings.
Nazaroff WW
Indoor Air; 2012 Aug; 22(4):263-5. PubMed ID: 22775514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Open Access Week 16-24 October: Open access increases access to the research].
Nilsonne G
Lakartidningen; 2010 Oct 13-19; 107(41):2491. PubMed ID: 21137568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Open-access.com.
Hudzik B; Polonski L
Int J Cardiol; 2014 Feb; 171(2):284. PubMed ID: 24342400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Open but not free--publishing in the 21st century.
Frank M
N Engl J Med; 2013 Feb; 368(9):787-9. PubMed ID: 23445089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. PLoS biology--we're open.
Bernstein P; Cohen B; MacCallum C; Parthasarathy H; Patterson M; Siegel V
PLoS Biol; 2003 Oct; 1(1):E34. PubMed ID: 14551925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Open access as public policy.
Gass A
PLoS Biol; 2004 Oct; 2(10):e353. PubMed ID: 15486586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Open access publishing: a digital bridge for developing nations?
Adusumilli PS; Mullerad M
Natl Med J India; 2004; 17(3):167-8. PubMed ID: 15253405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Open access publication in biomedical research: implications for developing countries.
Satyanarayana K
Indian J Med Res; 2004 Aug; 120(2):67-9. PubMed ID: 15347853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific publishing. NIH wants public access to papers 'as soon as possible'.
Kaiser J
Science; 2005 Feb; 307(5711):825. PubMed ID: 15705812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The downside of open-access publishing.
Haug C
N Engl J Med; 2013 Feb; 368(9):791-3. PubMed ID: 23445091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Open the floodgates for online feedback on scientific papers? Not so fast.
Buriak JM
ACS Nano; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 23336533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Is open access to medical research literature relevant to low- and middle-income countries?
King R; Tamber PS
Natl Med J India; 2004; 17(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 15253396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
