140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24045003)
21. PLoS Biology in action.
Cohen B
PLoS Biol; 2004 Jan; 2(1):E25. PubMed ID: 14737199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. International Network for the Availability of Scientific Publications: facilitating scientific publishing in developing countries.
Smart P
PLoS Biol; 2004 Nov; 2(11):e326. PubMed ID: 15547641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. PLOS position on NIH public access policy.
Gass A; Doyle H
Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5720):356. PubMed ID: 15831740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Galvanizing mental health research in low- and middle-income countries: role of scientific journals.
Natl Med J India; 2004; 17(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 15141603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing.
Davis PM
FASEB J; 2011 Jul; 25(7):2129-34. PubMed ID: 21450907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Open arms for open access: Toxicological Sciences joins "Oxford Open".
Lehman-McKeeman L; Andrews S
Toxicol Sci; 2007 Dec; 100(2):317. PubMed ID: 18003599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine - achievements and perspectives.
Pieroni A
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed; 2006 Feb; 2():10. PubMed ID: 16460576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Access to the scientific literature--a difficult balance.
Frank M
N Engl J Med; 2006 Apr; 354(15):1552-5. PubMed ID: 16611948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Open access mandate threatens dissemination of scientific information.
McMullan E
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18347464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Why PLoS became a publisher.
Brown PO; Eisen MB; Varmus HE
PLoS Biol; 2003 Oct; 1(1):E36. PubMed ID: 14551926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Do open access biomedical journals benefit smaller countries? The Slovenian experience.
Turk N
Health Info Libr J; 2011 Jun; 28(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 21564498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Publishing sensitive data: who calls the shots? Journals joust over conflict-of-interest rules.
Marshall E
Science; 1997 Apr; 276(5312):524. PubMed ID: 9148406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Reducing the costs of peer review.
Nat Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 11(4):375. PubMed ID: 18368038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue?
Oren GA
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18347450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The open access advantage.
Eysenbach G
J Med Internet Res; 2006 May; 8(2):e8. PubMed ID: 16867971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Role of medical journals in the shaping of medical knowledge].
Ramel B
Lakartidningen; 2004 Oct; 101(44):3441-3. PubMed ID: 15560660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomedical Journals in India: some critical concerns.
Satyanarayana K; Sharma A
Indian J Med Res; 2010 Aug; 132():119-22. PubMed ID: 20716810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Open access in the biomedical field: a unique opportunity for researchers (and research itself).
Giglia E
Eura Medicophys; 2007 Jun; 43(2):203-13. PubMed ID: 17589413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Open access.
McDonald JC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(2):83. PubMed ID: 17110385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Suppression, bias, and selection in science: the case of cancer research.
Hess DJ
Account Res; 1999; 6(4):245-57. PubMed ID: 11657839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
