These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24045015)

  • 1. Prepotency in action: does children's knowledge of an artifact affect their ability to inhibit acting on it?
    Simpson A; Carroll DJ; Riggs KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Feb; 118():127-33. PubMed ID: 24045015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Where does prepotency come from on developmental tests of inhibitory control?
    Simpson A; Upson M; Carroll DJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Oct; 162():18-30. PubMed ID: 28554069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Under what conditions do young children have difficulty inhibiting manual actions?
    Simpson A; Riggs KJ
    Dev Psychol; 2007 Mar; 43(2):417-28. PubMed ID: 17352549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do actions speak louder than knowledge? Action manipulation, parental discourse, and children's mental state understanding in pretense.
    Melzer DK; Claxton LJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Dec; 128():21-36. PubMed ID: 25050795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do displacement activities help preschool children to inhibit a forbidden action?
    Pecora G; Addessi E; Schino G; Bellagamba F
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Oct; 126():80-90. PubMed ID: 24907630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Refining the understanding of inhibitory processes: how response prepotency is created and overcome.
    Simpson A; Riggs KJ; Beck SR; Gorniak SL; Wu Y; Abbott D; Diamond A
    Dev Sci; 2012 Jan; 15(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 22251293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developmental change in intentional action and inhibition: a heart rate analysis.
    Schel MA; Windhorst DA; van der Molen MW; Crone EA
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Aug; 50(8):812-9. PubMed ID: 23718701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choosing to Stop: Responses Evoked by Externally Triggered and Internally Generated Inhibition Identify a Neural Mechanism of Will.
    Parkinson J; Haggard P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 27(10):1948-56. PubMed ID: 26042503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of perceptual similarity of the task environments in children's perseverative responding.
    Jowkar-Baniani G; Schmuckler MA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Nov; 116(3):640-58. PubMed ID: 23998950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Seeing triggers acting, hearing does not trigger saying: evidence from children's weak inhibition.
    Simpson A; Cooper NR; Gillmeister H; Riggs KJ
    Cognition; 2013 Aug; 128(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 23669048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development in children's comprehension of linguistic register.
    Wagner L; Greene-Havas M; Gillespie R
    Child Dev; 2010; 81(6):1678-86. PubMed ID: 21077856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conditions under which children experience inhibitory difficulty with a "button-press" go/no-go task.
    Simpson A; Riggs KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 May; 94(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 16325846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Infants' symbolic comprehension of actions modeled with toy replicas.
    Johnson KE; Younger BA; Furrer SD
    Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):299-314. PubMed ID: 15985062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When this means that: the role of working memory and inhibitory control in children's understanding of representations.
    Astle A; Kamawar D; Vendetti C; Podjarny G
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):169-85. PubMed ID: 23773918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Young children's comprehension of pretend episodes: the integration of successive actions.
    Harris PL; Kavanaugh RD; Meredith MC
    Child Dev; 1994 Feb; 65(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 8131644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preschoolers' sensitivity to speaker action constraints to infer referential intent.
    Collins SJ; Graham SA; Chambers CG
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Aug; 112(4):389-402. PubMed ID: 22651891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Under what conditions do children have difficulty in inhibiting imitation? Evidence for the importance of planning specific responses.
    Simpson A; Riggs KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Aug; 109(4):512-24. PubMed ID: 21458827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gravity is not the only ruler for falling events: Young children stop making the gravity error after receiving additional perceptual information about the tubes mechanism.
    Bascandziev I; Harris PL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Aug; 109(4):468-77. PubMed ID: 21497828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conditions under which young children can hold two rules in mind and inhibit a prepotent response.
    Diamond A; Kirkham N; Amso D
    Dev Psychol; 2002 May; 38(3):352-62. PubMed ID: 12005379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-year-olds grasp the intentional structure of pretense acts.
    Rakoczy H; Tomasello M
    Dev Sci; 2006 Nov; 9(6):557-64. PubMed ID: 17059452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.