These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Why would physicians undervalue reviews by the Cochrane Collaboration? Badgett R J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 May; 61(5):419-21. PubMed ID: 18394533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What has the Cochrane collaboration ever done for newborn infants? McGuire W; Fowlie PW; Soll RF Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2010 Jan; 95(1):F2-6. PubMed ID: 19414431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Cochrane Collaboration review prioritization projects show that a variety of approaches successfully identify high-priority topics. Bero LA; Binder L J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):472-3. PubMed ID: 22959591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [The development of the Spanish Cochrane Collaboration]. Bonfill X; Etcheverry C; Martí J; Glutting JP; Urrutia G; Pladevall M Med Clin (Barc); 1999; 112 Suppl 1():17-20. PubMed ID: 10618795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Cochrane collaboration. What is it? What is it for? How does it contribute to the practice of evidence based medicine?]. Sampaio C; Ferreira JJ Acta Med Port; 1998; 11(8-9):739-44. PubMed ID: 9951065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Occupational therapists should be more involved in the Cochrane Collaboration: the example of the Australian Cochrane Musculoskeletal Review Group. Martin E; Baggaley K; Buchbinder R; Johnston R; Tugwell P; Maxwell L; Santesso N Aust Occup Ther J; 2008 Sep; 55(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 20887463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Knowledge synthesis, translation and exchange in public health and health promotion: the role of a Cochrane Review Group. Waters E; Armstrong R Promot Educ; 2007; 14(1):34-5. PubMed ID: 17526322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment and treatment of malnutrition in Dutch geriatric practice: consensus through a modified Delphi study. van Asselt DZ; van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA; van der Cammen TJ; Disselhorst LG; Janse A; Lonterman-Monasch S; Maas HA; Popescu ME; Schölzel-Dorenbos CJ; Sipers WM; Veldhoven CM; Wijnen HH; Olde Rikkert MG Age Ageing; 2012 May; 41(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 22334385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cochrane collaboration-based reviews of health-care interventions: are they unequivocal and valid scientifically, or simply nihilistic? Gatchel RJ; McGeary D Spine J; 2002; 2(5):315-9. PubMed ID: 14589461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence in agenda setting: new directions for the Cochrane Collaboration. Nasser M; Welch V; Ueffing E; Crowe S; Oliver S; Carlo R J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):469-71. PubMed ID: 23312393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A negative but positive Cochrane review. Ah-See KW; Little SA Clin Otolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 32(2):137-8. PubMed ID: 17403238 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. What is Cochrane all about? Del Mar C; Doust J Aust Fam Physician; 2002 Nov; 31(11):1027-9. PubMed ID: 12471961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Cochrane Collaboration and systematic reviews. Clarke M Br J Surg; 2007 Apr; 94(4):391-2. PubMed ID: 17380545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]