138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24045555)
1. Performance and reproducibility of gynecologic cytology interpretation using the FocalPoint system: results of the RODEO Study Team.
Stein MD; Fregnani JH; Scapulatempo C; Mafra A; Campacci N; Longatto-Filho A;
Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Oct; 140(4):567-71. PubMed ID: 24045555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. BD focalpoint slide profiler performance with atypical glandular cells on SurePath Papanicolaou smears.
Chute DJ; Lim H; Kong CS
Cancer Cytopathol; 2010 Apr; 118(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 20209621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A retrospective validation of the FocalPoint GS slide profiler NFR technology by analysis of interval disease outcomes compared with manual cytology.
Nuttall DS; Hillier S; Clayton HR; Savage AJ; Martin CM; O'Leary JJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Apr; 127(4):240-246. PubMed ID: 30825407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multisite direct-to-vial study.
Fremont-Smith M; Marino J; Griffin B; Spencer L; Bolick D
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 102(5):269-79. PubMed ID: 15386329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of manual workload limits in gynecologic cytology: reconciling data from 3 major prospective trials of automated screening devices.
Renshaw AA; Elsheikh TM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Apr; 139(4):428-33. PubMed ID: 23525612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].
Della Palma P; Moresco L; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43. PubMed ID: 23139174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MAVARIC - a comparison of automation-assisted and manual cervical screening: a randomised controlled trial.
Kitchener HC; Blanks R; Cubie H; Desai M; Dunn G; Legood R; Gray A; Sadique Z; Moss S;
Health Technol Assess; 2011 Jan; 15(3):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-170. PubMed ID: 21266159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of CellSolutions BestPrep® automated thin-layer liquid-based cytology Papanicolaou slide preparation and BestCyte® cell sorter imaging system.
Delga A; Goffin F; Kridelka F; Marée R; Lambert C; Delvenne P
Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(5):469-77. PubMed ID: 25277345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of computer-assisted and manual screening of cervical cytology.
Lozano R
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jan; 104(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 16959306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A validation study of the FocalPoint GS imaging system for gynecologic cytology screening.
Colgan TJ; Bon N; Clipsham S; Gardiner G; Sumner J; Walley V; McLachlin CM
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Apr; 121(4):189-96. PubMed ID: 23361915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Results of an Australian trial using SurePath liquid-based cervical cytology with FocalPoint computer-assisted screening technology.
Bowditch RC; Clarke JM; Baird PJ; Greenberg ML
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1093-9. PubMed ID: 22045553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the FocalPoint GS system performance in an Italian population-based screening of cervical abnormalities.
Passamonti B; Bulletti S; Camilli M; D'Amico MR; Di Dato E; Gustinucci D; Martinelli N; Malaspina M; Spita N
Acta Cytol; 2007; 51(6):865-71. PubMed ID: 18077978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of the SurePath liquid-based Pap test in automated screening and in detection of HSIL.
Cengel KA; Day SJ; Davis-Devine S; Adams CL; Madison-Henness D; Hartman ME; Freund GG
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Nov; 29(5):250-5. PubMed ID: 14595790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening.
Bentz JS
Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2005 Nov; 5(6):857-71. PubMed ID: 16255628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Only a small fraction of high-grade cervical lesions are discovered after an interpretation of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance when using imager-assisted, liquid-based papanicolaou tests and the Bethesda 2001 system.
Khan KA; Smith DA; Thrall MJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Jul; 137(7):936-41. PubMed ID: 22994456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementation of the ThinPrep Imaging System in a tertiary military medical center.
Duby JM; DiFurio MJ
Cancer; 2009 Aug; 117(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 19536887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Whole-Slide Imaging of Pap Cellblock Preparations Is a Potentially Valid Screening Method.
Tawfik O; Davis M; Dillon S; Tawfik L; Diaz FJ; Amin K; Fan F
Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 25967603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel automated screening and interpretation process for cervical cytology using the internet transmission of low-resolution images: a feasibility study.
Eichhorn JH; Brauns TA; Gelfand JA; Crothers BA; Wilbur DC
Cancer; 2005 Aug; 105(4):199-206. PubMed ID: 15937917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FocalPoint slide classification algorithms show robust performance in classification of high-grade lesions on SurePath liquid-based cervical cytology slides.
Parker EM; Foti JA; Wilbur DC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Feb; 30(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 14755762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The positive impact of simultaneous implementation of the BD FocalPoint GS Imaging System and lean principles on the operation of gynecologic cytology.
Wong R; Levi AW; Harigopal M; Schofield K; Chhieng DC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Feb; 136(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 22288966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
