212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24045887)
1. Implementation of a combo videolaryngoscope for intubation in critically ill patients: a before-after comparative study.
De Jong A; Clavieras N; Conseil M; Coisel Y; Moury PH; Pouzeratte Y; Cisse M; Belafia F; Jung B; Chanques G; Molinari N; Jaber S
Intensive Care Med; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2144-52. PubMed ID: 24045887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in an emergency department: A randomised clinical trial.
Sulser S; Ubmann D; Schlaepfer M; Brueesch M; Goliasch G; Seifert B; Spahn DR; Ruetzler K
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2016 Dec; 33(12):943-948. PubMed ID: 27533711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope after failed direct laryngoscopy.
Noppens RR; Möbus S; Heid F; Schmidtmann I; Werner C; Piepho T
Anaesthesia; 2010 Jul; 65(7):716-20. PubMed ID: 20528841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. GlideScope videolaryngoscope reduces the incidence of erroneous esophageal intubation by novice laryngoscopists.
Hirabayashi Y; Otsuka Y; Seo N
J Anesth; 2010 Apr; 24(2):303-5. PubMed ID: 20108005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in critically ill patients: a pilot randomized trial.
Griesdale DE; Chau A; Isac G; Ayas N; Foster D; Irwin C; Choi P;
Can J Anaesth; 2012 Nov; 59(11):1032-9. PubMed ID: 22932944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tracheal tube placement in patients with a good glottic view at direct laryngoscopy.
Yao WL; Wan L; Xu H; Qian W; Wang XR; Tian YK; Zhang CH
Anaesthesia; 2015 Jul; 70(7):810-7. PubMed ID: 25721326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. McGRATH MAC videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation in intensive care patients: the randomised multicentre MACMAN trial study protocol.
Bailly A; Lascarrou JB; Le Thuaut A; Boisrame-Helms J; Kamel T; Mercier E; Ricard JD; Lemiale V; Champigneulle B; Reignier J;
BMJ Open; 2015 Dec; 5(12):e009855. PubMed ID: 26700287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of Videolaryngoscopy Expertise on First-Attempt Intubation Success in Critically Ill Patients.
Amalric M; Larcher R; Brunot V; Garnier F; De Jong A; Moulaire Rigollet V; Corne P; Klouche K; Jung B
Crit Care Med; 2020 Oct; 48(10):e889-e896. PubMed ID: 32769622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of intubation conditions with CMAC Miller videolaryngoscope and conventional Miller laryngoscope in lateral position in infants: A prospective randomized trial.
Jain D; Mehta S; Gandhi K; Arora S; Parikh B; Abas M
Paediatr Anaesth; 2018 Mar; 28(3):226-230. PubMed ID: 29316004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Difficult Airway Characteristics Associated with First-Attempt Failure at Intubation Using Video Laryngoscopy in the Intensive Care Unit.
Joshi R; Hypes CD; Greenberg J; Snyder L; Malo J; Bloom JW; Chopra H; Sakles JC; Mosier JM
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Mar; 14(3):368-375. PubMed ID: 27983871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults.
Prekker ME; Driver BE; Trent SA; Resnick-Ault D; Seitz KP; Russell DW; Gaillard JP; Latimer AJ; Ghamande SA; Gibbs KW; Vonderhaar DJ; Whitson MR; Barnes CR; Walco JP; Douglas IS; Krishnamoorthy V; Dagan A; Bastman JJ; Lloyd BD; Gandotra S; Goranson JK; Mitchell SH; White HD; Palakshappa JA; Espinera A; Page DB; Joffe A; Hansen SJ; Hughes CG; George T; Herbert JT; Shapiro NI; Schauer SG; Long BJ; Imhoff B; Wang L; Rhoads JP; Womack KN; Janz DR; Self WH; Rice TW; Ginde AA; Casey JD; Semler MW;
N Engl J Med; 2023 Aug; 389(5):418-429. PubMed ID: 37326325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and performance testing of the low-cost, 3D-printed, smartphone-compatible 'Tansen Videolaryngoscope' vs. Pentax-AWS videolaryngoscope vs. direct Macintosh laryngoscope: A manikin study.
Lambert CT; John SC; John AV
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2020 Nov; 37(11):992-998. PubMed ID: 32675700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of three video laryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopy for emergency endotracheal intubation: a retrospective cohort study.
Suzuki K; Kusunoki S; Tanigawa K; Shime N
BMJ Open; 2019 Mar; 9(3):e024927. PubMed ID: 30928937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Macintosh Videolaryngoscope for Intubation in the Operating Room: A Comparative Quality Improvement Project.
De Jong A; Pouzeratte Y; Laplace A; Normanno M; Rollé A; Verzilli D; Perrigault PF; Colson P; Capdevila X; Molinari N; Jaber S
Anesth Analg; 2021 Feb; 132(2):524-535. PubMed ID: 32739955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomised, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway.
Taylor AM; Peck M; Launcelott S; Hung OR; Law JA; MacQuarrie K; McKeen D; George RB; Ngan J
Anaesthesia; 2013 Feb; 68(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 23121470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical study of SMT-Ⅱ video laryngoscope with difficult airway intubation in emergency department].
Yu JH; Wang Y
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 55(7):549-553. PubMed ID: 28655086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of learning direct laryngoscopy using a McGrath videolaryngoscope as a direct versus indirect laryngoscope: a randomized controlled trial.
Yi IK; Hwang J; Min SK; Lim GM; Chae YJ
J Int Med Res; 2021 May; 49(5):3000605211016740. PubMed ID: 34024186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial.
Yi IK; Kwak HJ; Lee KC; Lee JH; Min SK; Kim JY
Eur J Med Res; 2020 Aug; 25(1):35. PubMed ID: 32819444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Pentax Airway Scope and Macintosh laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation in children: A randomised non-inferiority trial.
Yi IK; Kwak HJ; Kim KM; Ahn SH; Lee SY; Kim JY
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2019 Aug; 63(7):853-858. PubMed ID: 30900242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Rigid Fiberscope with Direct Laryngoscopy in Easy and Difficult Airway Scenarios: A Manikin Study.
Kaplan A; Göksu E; Yıldız G; Kılıç T
J Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 50(3):e107-14. PubMed ID: 26725922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
