BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

44 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24045921)

  • 1. Projecting the yearly mortality reductions due to a cancer screening programme.
    Liu ZA; Hanley JA; Strumpf EC
    J Med Screen; 2013; 20(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 24045921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.
    Hristova L; Hakama M
    Acta Oncol; 1997; 36 Suppl 9():1-60. PubMed ID: 9143316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring mortality reductions in cancer screening trials.
    Hanley JA
    Epidemiol Rev; 2011; 33():36-45. PubMed ID: 21624962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood test within a multiple disease screening programme: an experience from Keelung, Taiwan.
    Yang KC; Liao CS; Chiu YH; Yen AM; Chen TH
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 17227635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for lung cancer with low dose spiral CT (computed tomography) in the Australian setting.
    Manser R; Dalton A; Carter R; Byrnes G; Elwood M; Campbell DA
    Lung Cancer; 2005 May; 48(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 15829317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term follow-up study of a population-based 1996-1998 mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography.
    Sone S; Nakayama T; Honda T; Tsushima K; Li F; Haniuda M; Takahashi Y; Suzuki T; Yamanda T; Kondo R; Hanaoka T; Takayama F; Kubo K; Fushimi H
    Lung Cancer; 2007 Dec; 58(3):329-41. PubMed ID: 17675180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Annual number of lung cancer deaths potentially avertable by screening in the United States.
    Ma J; Ward EM; Smith R; Jemal A
    Cancer; 2013 Apr; 119(7):1381-5. PubMed ID: 23440730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cancer screening in the USA.
    Smith RA
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S48-53. PubMed ID: 17227643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of service screening on breast cancer mortality rates.
    Cox B
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Aug; 17(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 18562953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cancer screening: evidence and practice in Europe 2008.
    Hakama M; Coleman MP; Alexe DM; Auvinen A
    Eur J Cancer; 2008 Jul; 44(10):1404-13. PubMed ID: 18343653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of cancer screening from the epidemiologic point of view].
    Oshima A
    Gan No Rinsho; 1989 Jan; 35(2):253-7. PubMed ID: 2649707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolution of multiple disease screening in Keelung: a model for community involvement in health interventions?
    Wang PE; Wang TT; Chiu YH; Yen AM; Chen TH
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S54-8. PubMed ID: 17227644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the effectiveness of radon screening programs in reducing lung cancer mortality.
    Gagnon F; Courchesne M; Lévesque B; Ayotte P; Leclerc JM; Belles-Isles JC; Prévost C; Dessau JC
    Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1221-30. PubMed ID: 18761730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Epidemiology of cancer in the United States.
    Cresanta JL
    Prim Care; 1992 Sep; 19(3):419-41. PubMed ID: 1410056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Significance tests for cancer screening trials.
    Tarone RE; Gart JJ
    Biometrics; 1989 Sep; 45(3):883-90. PubMed ID: 2790126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early reporting for cancer screening trials.
    Baker SG; Kramer BS; Prorok PC
    J Med Screen; 2008; 15(3):122-9. PubMed ID: 18927094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening for lung cancer.
    Eddy DM
    Ann Intern Med; 1990 Jan; 112(1):73-4. PubMed ID: 2403475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deaths averted: An unbiased alternative to rate ratios for measuring the performance of cancer screening programs.
    Deck W; Hanley JA
    J Med Screen; 2023 Nov; ():9691413231215963. PubMed ID: 37990538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating reductions in cancer mortality.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Oct; 95(20):1501. PubMed ID: 14559862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should we expect all-cause mortality reductions in large screening studies?
    Dobbin KK; Ebell M
    Br J Gen Pract; 2018 Jun; 68(671):290-291. PubMed ID: 29853594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.