166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24046114)
1. Impact of margin assessment method on positive margin rate and total volume excised.
Moo TA; Choi L; Culpepper C; Olcese C; Heerdt A; Sclafani L; King TA; Reiner AS; Patil S; Brogi E; Morrow M; Van Zee KJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 24046114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.
Chagpar AB; Killelea BK; Tsangaris TN; Butler M; Stavris K; Li F; Yao X; Bossuyt V; Harigopal M; Lannin DR; Pusztai L; Horowitz NR
N Engl J Med; 2015 Aug; 373(6):503-10. PubMed ID: 26028131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do All Positive Margins in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing a Partial Mastectomy Need to Be Resected?
Chagpar AB; Tsangaris TN; Lannin DR
J Am Coll Surg; 2018 Jul; 227(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 29524664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Circumferential Shaving of the Cavity in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Chen K; Zhu L; Chen L; Li Q; Li S; Qiu N; Yang Y; Su F; Song E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 26(13):4256-4263. PubMed ID: 31429019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Excising Additional Margins at Initial Breast-Conserving Surgery (BCS) Reduces the Need for Re-excision in a Predominantly African American Population: A Report of a Randomized Prospective Study in a Public Hospital.
Jones V; Linebarger J; Perez S; Gabram S; Okoli J; Bumpers H; Burns B; Mosunjac M; Rizzo M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):456-64. PubMed ID: 26254169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of systematic cavity shave margins in breast-conserving surgery at a large community hospital with a low baseline re-excision rate.
Vetter C; Ashok A; Perez M; Musaad S; Rahimi G; Gohil K; Higham A
Breast J; 2020 Oct; 26(10):1960-1965. PubMed ID: 33078470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast-Conserving Surgeries With and Without Cavity Shave Margins Have Different Re-excision Rates and Associated Overall Cost: Institutional and Patient-Driven Decisions for Its Utilization.
Cartagena LC; McGuire K; Zot P; Pillappa R; Idowu M; Robila V
Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Oct; 21(5):e594-e601. PubMed ID: 33814286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of intra-operative margin management techniques in breast-conserving surgery: a standardised approach reduces the likelihood of residual disease without increasing operative time.
Bolger JC; Solon JG; Khan SA; Hill AD; Power CP
Breast Cancer; 2015 May; 22(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 23649303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of age and extensive intraductal component histology upon breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor.
Wazer DE; Schmidt-Ullrich RK; Ruthazer R; DiPetrillo T; Boyle T; Kanski J; Safaii H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Nov; 45(4):885-91. PubMed ID: 10571194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Effect of Lumpectomy and Cavity Shave Margin Status on Recurrence and Survival in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Abdelsattar JM; Afridi FG; Dai Z; Yousaf N; Seldomridge A; Battin AO; Wen S; Gray D; Marsh JW; Cowher MS; Partin JF; Hazard-Jenkins H; Lupinacci K
Am Surg; 2023 Mar; 89(3):424-433. PubMed ID: 34196595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic factors for residual occult disease in shave margins during partial mastectomy.
Siegel JB; Mukherjee R; Park Y; Cluver AR; Chung C; Cole DJ; Lockett MA; Klauber-DeMore N; Abbott AM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Sep; 189(2):471-481. PubMed ID: 34132936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
Merrill AL; Coopey SB; Tang R; McEvoy MP; Specht MC; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 26467458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of margin assessment by radial and shave sections in wide local excision specimens for invasive carcinoma of the breast.
Hodi Z; Ellis IO; Elston CW; Pinder SE; Donovan G; Macmillan RD; Lee AH
Histopathology; 2010 Apr; 56(5):573-80. PubMed ID: 20459567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of Cavity Shave Margins on Margin Status in Patients with Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.
Howard-McNatt M; Dupont E; Tsangaris T; Garcia-Cantu C; Chiba A; Berger AC; Levine EA; Gass JS; Ollila DW; Chagpar AB;
J Am Coll Surg; 2021 Apr; 232(4):373-378. PubMed ID: 33346081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Resection margins in ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Olsha O; Shemesh D; Carmon M; Sibirsky O; Abu Dalo R; Rivkin L; Ashkenazi I
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 20734147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cavity Shaving Reduces Involved Margins and Reinterventions Without Increasing Costs in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Corsi F; Sorrentino L; Bonzini M; Bossi D; Truffi M; Amadori R; Nebuloni M; Brillat B; Mazzucchelli S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 24(6):1516-1524. PubMed ID: 28116620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden.
Wazer DE; Schmidt-Ullrich RK; Schmid CH; Ruthazer R; Kramer B; Safaii H; Graham R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 May; 38(2):291-9. PubMed ID: 9226315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shaves off the Cavity or Specimen in Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer.
Iwai Y; Prigoff JG; Sun L; Wiechmann L; Taback B; Rao R; Ugras SK
J Surg Res; 2022 Sep; 277():296-302. PubMed ID: 35526391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?
Wood WC
Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S115-7. PubMed ID: 24074771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
