293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24046379)
1. Coronary anatomy to predict physiology: fundamental limits.
Johnson NP; Kirkeeide RL; Gould KL
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Sep; 6(5):817-32. PubMed ID: 24046379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenosis using CT angiography: diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve computed from coronary CT angiography compared to invasively measured fractional flow reserve.
Yoon YE; Choi JH; Kim JH; Park KW; Doh JH; Kim YJ; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Gwon HC; Choe YH; Choi DJ; Kim HS; Oh BH; Park YB
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1088-96. PubMed ID: 23153908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combining anatomy and physiology: New angiography-based and computed tomography coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve indices.
Tomaniak M; Serruys PW
Cardiol J; 2020; 27(3):225-229. PubMed ID: 32583402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries.
Tu S; Barbato E; Köszegi Z; Yang J; Sun Z; Holm NR; Tar B; Li Y; Rusinaru D; Wijns W; Reiber JH
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):768-77. PubMed ID: 25060020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computational fluid dynamics: can computed tomography imaging compete with cath-lab physiology?
Marwan M
Cardiovasc Res; 2019 Mar; 115(4):e41-e43. PubMed ID: 30907416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Invasive coronary physiology for assessing intermediate lesions.
Fearon WF
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Feb; 8(2):e001942. PubMed ID: 25657316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring Coronary Circulatory Response to Stenosis and Its Association With Invasive Physiologic Indexes Using Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow and Coronary Pressure.
Lee JM; Hwang D; Park J; Zhang J; Tong Y; Kim CH; Bang JI; Suh M; Paeng JC; Cheon GJ; Koo BK
Circulation; 2017 Nov; 136(19):1798-1808. PubMed ID: 28851731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review of imaging anatomy in predicting functional significance of coronary stenoses determined by fractional flow reserve.
Chu M; Dai N; Yang J; Westra J; Tu S
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 33(7):975-990. PubMed ID: 28265791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of fractional flow reserve in different anatomical subsets.
Lau JK; Yong AS
Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Aug; 26 Suppl 1():e2-7. PubMed ID: 26247266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Expert consensus statement on the use of fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography: a consensus statement of the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.
Lotfi A; Jeremias A; Fearon WF; Feldman MD; Mehran R; Messenger JC; Grines CL; Dean LS; Kern MJ; Klein LW;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Mar; 83(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 24227282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnosis of Coronary Disease and Icing on the Cake.
Min JK; Chandrashekhar Y; Narula J
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Sep; 8(9):1117-1120. PubMed ID: 26381774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Angiographically minimal but functionally significant coronary lesion confirmed by optical coherence tomography.
Yoon HJ; Cho YK; Nam CW; Kim KB; Hur SH
Korean J Intern Med; 2016 Jul; 31(4):807-8. PubMed ID: 27320616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimization of Tryton dedicated coronary bifurcation system with coregistration of optical coherence tomography and fractional flow reserve.
Pyxaras SA; Tu S; Barbato E; Reiber JH; Wijns W
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):e39-40. PubMed ID: 23866192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of left main artery stenosis with fractional flow reserve is affected by downstream stenosis in the left anterior descending artery.
Bing R; Yong AS; Fearon WF
Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Aug; 26 Suppl 1():e35-7. PubMed ID: 26247268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Developments and controversies in coronary physiology and imaging.
Ng MK; Barlis P
Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Aug; 26 Suppl 1():e1. PubMed ID: 26247264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Focused update of expert consensus statement: Use of invasive assessments of coronary physiology and structure: A position statement of the society of cardiac angiography and interventions.
Lotfi A; Davies JE; Fearon WF; Grines CL; Kern MJ; Klein LW
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):336-347. PubMed ID: 29968425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel approach for fractional flow reserve derivation from coronary computed tomographic angiography.
Renker M; Wang R; Schoepf UJ; Spearman JV; Baumann S
Coron Artery Dis; 2015 May; 26(3):279-80. PubMed ID: 25493661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Sex differences in the visual-functional mismatch between coronary angiography or intravascular ultrasound versus fractional flow reserve.
Kang SJ; Ahn JM; Han S; Lee JY; Kim WJ; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Mintz GS; Park SJ
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 6(6):562-8. PubMed ID: 23787231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Assessment of fractional coronary blood flow reserve].
Mironov VM; Merkulov EV; Samko AN
Kardiologiia; 2012; 52(8):66-71. PubMed ID: 23098402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between optical coherence tomography derived intraluminal and intramural criteria and haemodynamic relevance as determined by fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary stenoses of patients with type 2 diabetes.
Reith S; Battermann S; Jaskolka A; Lehmacher W; Hoffmann R; Marx N; Burgmaier M
Heart; 2013 May; 99(10):700-7. PubMed ID: 23543283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
