These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24046382)

  • 1. Limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the evaluation of serial stenoses.
    Scantlebury DC; Geske JB; Nishimura RA
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Sep; 6(5):850-2. PubMed ID: 24046382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding the catheter-Doppler pressure gradient discrepancy in aortic stenosis.
    Pai RG; Pai AD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2011 May; 20(3):299-300. PubMed ID: 21714420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exercise echocardiography in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis.
    Vamvakidou A; Karogiannis N; Ramzy I; Elghamaz A; Senior R
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1561-2. PubMed ID: 26271199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determining that aortic valve stenosis is severe: back-to-the-future: physical examination and aortic valve area index/energy loss index < or =0.6 cm2/m2.
    Rahimtoola SH
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jun; 3(6):563-6. PubMed ID: 20541710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response to letter regarding article, "Limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the evaluation of serial stenoses".
    Scantlebury DC; Geske JB; Nishimura RA
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):212. PubMed ID: 24449554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Letter by Martin and Jenni regarding article, "Limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the evaluation of serial stenoses".
    Jenni R; Martin RP
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):211. PubMed ID: 24449553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementing a Continuous Quality Improvement Program in a High-Volume Clinical Echocardiography Laboratory: Improving Care for Patients With Aortic Stenosis.
    Samad Z; Minter S; Armour A; Tinnemore A; Sivak JA; Sedberry B; Strub K; Horan SM; Harrison JK; Kisslo J; Douglas PS; Velazquez EJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 26957220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The intraoperative quantification of aortic stenosis.
    Oxorn D
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jan; 108(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 19095824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stenosis is in the eye of the observer: impact of pressure recovery on assessing aortic valve area.
    Levine RA; Schwammenthal E
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2003 Feb; 41(3):443-5. PubMed ID: 12575973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemodynamic assessment of aortic stenosis: are there still lessons to learn?
    Baumgartner H
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Jan; 47(1):138-40. PubMed ID: 16386677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transesophageal echocardiography-guided, bed-side bail-out aortic valvuloplasty.
    Busch MC; Friesecke S; Empen K; Felix SB
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 May; 6(5):e24-5. PubMed ID: 23702020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imaging of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis.
    Tandon A; Grayburn PA
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 6(2):184-95. PubMed ID: 23489532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overestimation of aortic valve gradient measured by Doppler echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis.
    Sakthi C; Yee H; Kotlewski A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2005 Jun; 65(2):176-9. PubMed ID: 15812813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Diagnosis and assessment of severity of aortic valve stenosis].
    Franke A; Kühl HP
    Herz; 2006 Oct; 31(7):644-9. PubMed ID: 17072777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemodynamic evaluation of suspected severe aortic stenosis leads to a diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma.
    Lake M; Tanawuttiwat T; Bilsker M; De Marchena E
    Tex Heart Inst J; 2015 Feb; 42(1):77-9. PubMed ID: 25873807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Progression of aortic stenosis in adults: new insights provided by Doppler echocardiography.
    Roger VL; Tajik AJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Jan; 2(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 8269103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comment on: overestimation of aortic valve gradient measured by Doppler echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;65:176-9.
    Laskey WK; Osborne L
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2005 Dec; 66(4):598. PubMed ID: 16208715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stress echocardiography to assess stenosis severity and predict outcome in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF.
    Clavel MA; Ennezat PV; Maréchaux S; Dumesnil JG; Capoulade R; Hachicha Z; Mathieu P; Bellouin A; Bergeron S; Meimoun P; Arsenault M; Le Tourneau T; Pasquet A; Couture C; Pibarot P
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 6(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 23489531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity.
    Garcia D; Dumesnil JG; Durand LG; Kadem L; Pibarot P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2003 Feb; 41(3):435-42. PubMed ID: 12575972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.