These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24046441)

  • 1. Physician self-referral: frequency of negative findings at MR imaging of the knee as a marker of appropriate utilization.
    Lungren MP; Amrhein TJ; Paxton BE; Srinivasan RC; Collins HR; Eastwood JD; Kilani RK
    Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):810-5. PubMed ID: 24046441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physician self-referral of lumbar spine MRI with comparative analysis of negative study rates as a marker of utilization appropriateness.
    Paxton BE; Lungren MP; Srinivasan RC; Jung SH; Yu M; Eastwood JD; Kilani RK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jun; 198(6):1375-9. PubMed ID: 22623551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Journal Club: Shoulder MRI utilization: relationship of physician MRI equipment ownership to negative study frequency.
    Amrhein TJ; Lungren MP; Paxton BE; Srinivasan R; Jung SH; Yu M; Eastwood JD; Kilani RK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):605-10. PubMed ID: 23971453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physician self-referral and imaging use appropriateness: negative cervical spine MRI frequency as an assessment metric.
    Amrhein TJ; Paxton BE; Lungren MP; Befera NT; Collins HR; Yurko C; Eastwood JD; Kilani RK
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Dec; 35(12):2248-53. PubMed ID: 25104287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening breast MR imaging: comparison of interpretation of baseline and annual follow-up studies.
    Abramovici G; Mainiero MB
    Radiology; 2011 Apr; 259(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 21285337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ownership or leasing of MRI facilities by nonradiologist physicians is a rapidly growing trend.
    Levin DC; Rao VM; Parker L; Frangos AJ; Sunshine JH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Feb; 5(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 18242525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Utilization of diagnostic medical imaging: comparison of radiologist referral versus same-specialty referral.
    Gazelle GS; Halpern EF; Ryan HS; Tramontano AC
    Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):517-22. PubMed ID: 17940306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utilization trends for advanced imaging procedures: evidence from individuals with private insurance coverage in California.
    Mitchell JM
    Med Care; 2008 May; 46(5):460-6. PubMed ID: 18438193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MR imaging: effectiveness and costs at triage of patients with nonacute knee symptoms.
    Vincken PW; ter Braak AP; van Erkel AR; Coerkamp EG; de Rooy TP; de Lange S; Mallens WM; Coene LN; Bloem RM; van Luijt PA; van den Hout WB; van Houwelingen HC; Bloem JL
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 17090714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint: value of adding a T2 mapping sequence to a routine MR imaging protocol.
    Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Munoz Del Rio A; Baer GS; Graf BK
    Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):503-13. PubMed ID: 23297335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MR imaging in the evaluation of chronic or recurrent headache.
    Tsushima Y; Endo K
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):575-9. PubMed ID: 15858096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Athletic pubalgia and the "sports hernia": MR imaging findings.
    Zoga AC; Kavanagh EC; Omar IM; Morrison WB; Koulouris G; Lopez H; Chaabra A; Domesek J; Meyers WC
    Radiology; 2008 Jun; 247(3):797-807. PubMed ID: 18487535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee joint.
    Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Davis KW; Shinki K; Kaplan LD; De Smet AA
    Radiology; 2009 Mar; 250(3):839-48. PubMed ID: 19164121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When does a radiologist's recommendation for follow-up result in high-cost imaging?
    Lee SI; Krishnaraj A; Chatterji M; Dreyer KJ; Thrall JH; Hahn PF
    Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):544-9. PubMed ID: 22084210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of Public Data to Target Variation in Providers' Use of CT and MR Imaging among Medicare Beneficiaries.
    Ip IK; Raja AS; Seltzer SE; Gawande AA; Joynt KE; Khorasani R
    Radiology; 2015 Jun; 275(3):718-24. PubMed ID: 25658040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recent trends in utilization rates of noncardiac thoracic imaging: an example of how imaging growth might be controlled.
    Levin DC; Rao VM; Parker L; Frangos AJ; Sunshine JH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Dec; 4(12):886-9. PubMed ID: 18047983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Focal cystic pancreatic lesions: assessing variation in radiologists' management recommendations.
    Ip IK; Mortele KJ; Prevedello LM; Khorasani R
    Radiology; 2011 Apr; 259(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 21292867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Juvenile versus adult osteochondritis dissecans of the knee: appropriate MR imaging criteria for instability.
    Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Shinki K; Fine JP; Graf BK; De Smet AA
    Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 18552309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does subspecialty referral affect the pretest probability for an abnormal finding on knee MRI of pediatric patients?
    Kan JH; Miller LS; Martus JE; Yu C; Hernanz-Schulman M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):W931-3. PubMed ID: 22021544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic performance of a dedicated 1.5-T breast MR imaging system.
    Hillman BJ; Harms SE; Stevens G; Stough RG; Hollingsworth AB; Kozlowski KF; Moss LJ
    Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22923716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.