These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24046983)

  • 1. Evaluation of microbial profile in dental unit waterlines and assessment of antimicrobial efficacy of two treating agents.
    Mungara J; Dilna NC; Joseph E; Reddy N
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 37(4):367-71. PubMed ID: 24046983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: tap water versus distilled water.
    Kettering JD; Stephens JA; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Naylor WP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2002 Aug; 3(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 12239573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of iodine in microbial control of dental treatment water.
    Puttaiah R; Seibert J; Spears R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 May; 12(3):143-51. PubMed ID: 22186807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sampling water from chemically cleaned dental units with detachable power scalers.
    Coan LL; Hughes EA; Hudson JC; Palenik CJ
    J Dent Hyg; 2007; 81(4):80. PubMed ID: 18173894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of 0.2% chlorhexidine on microbial and fungal contamination of dental unit waterlines.
    Agahi RH; Hashemipour MA; Kalantari M; Ayatollah-Mosavi A; Aghassi H; Nassab AH
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2014 May; 11(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 25097645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of a disinfectant/coolant irrigant on microbes isolated from dental unit water lines.
    Epstein JB; Dawson JR; Buivids IA; Wong B; Le ND
    Spec Care Dentist; 2002; 22(4):137-41. PubMed ID: 12449456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of an automated dental unit water system's contamination control protocol.
    Puttaiah R; Svoboda KK; Lin SM; Montebugnoli L; Dolci G; Spratt D; Siebert J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 22430686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dental unit waterlines: review and product evaluation.
    Panagakos FS; Lassiter T; Kumar E
    J N J Dent Assoc; 2001; 72(2):20-5, 38. PubMed ID: 11484611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effective control of dental chair unit waterline biofilm and marked reduction of bacterial contamination of output water using two peroxide-based disinfectants.
    Tuttlebee CM; O'Donnell MJ; Keane CT; Russell RJ; Sullivan DJ; Falkiner F; Coleman DC
    J Hosp Infect; 2002 Nov; 52(3):192-205. PubMed ID: 12419272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduction of bacterial levels in dental unit waterlines.
    Porteous NB; Cooley RL
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Sep; 35(8):630-4. PubMed ID: 15366526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Isolation of an unusual fungus in treated dental unit waterlines.
    Porteous NB; Redding SW; Thompson EH; Grooters AM; De Hoog S; Sutton DA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Jul; 134(7):853-8. PubMed ID: 12892442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: distilled water vs. antimicrobial agents.
    Kettering JD; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Stephens JA; Naylor WP; Zhang W
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 30(10):735-41. PubMed ID: 12403476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simulated-use evaluation of a strategy for preventing biofilm formation in dental unit waterlines.
    McDowell JW; Paulson DS; Mitchell JA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Jun; 135(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 15270166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Waterborne biofilms and dentistry: the changing face of infection control.
    Barbeau J
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Nov; 66(10):539-41. PubMed ID: 12584771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Failure of anti-retraction valves and the procedure for between patient flushing: a rationale for chemical control of dental unit waterline contamination.
    Montebugnoli L; Dolci G; Spratt DA; Puttaiah R
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 16296436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of ultrasonic scaling unit waterline contamination after use of chlorine dioxide mouthrinse lavage.
    Wirthlin MR; Marshall GW JR
    J Periodontol; 2001 Mar; 72(3):401-10. PubMed ID: 11327069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An investigation of the microbial contamination of dental unit air and water lines.
    Walker RJ; Burke FJ; Miller CH; Palenik CJ
    Int Dent J; 2004 Dec; 54(6):438-44. PubMed ID: 15633500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Water cleaning systems improves the water quality in dental unit water lines (DUWL). A report from the Public Dental Health of Västra Götaland region, Sweden.
    Dahlén G; Hjort G; Spencer I
    Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 24620507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are dentists enough aware of infectious risk associated with dental unit waterlines ?
    Robert A; Bousseau A; Costa D; Barbot V; Imbert C
    Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 2013 Jul; 52(1):e29-34. PubMed ID: 25461446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effect of Using Hydrogen Peroxide for Periodic Disinfection Combined With Continuous Disinfection to Control Contamination in Dental Unit Waterline].
    Chang J; Dang Y; Wang C; Li X
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2024 Jan; 55(1):217-223. PubMed ID: 38322511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.