These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24047600)

  • 1. A comparison of machine learning methods for classification using simulation with multiple real data examples from mental health studies.
    Khondoker M; Dobson R; Skirrow C; Simmons A; Stahl D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):1804-1823. PubMed ID: 24047600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of finite sample size on feature selection and classification: a simulation study.
    Way TW; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):907-20. PubMed ID: 20229900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative analysis of feature selection models for spatial analysis of floods using hybrid metaheuristic and machine learning models.
    Sarwar J; Khan SA; Azmat M; Khan F
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 May; 31(23):33495-33514. PubMed ID: 38684613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of extreme learning machine for classification of individual and combined finger movements using electromyography on amputees and non-amputees.
    Anam K; Al-Jumaily A
    Neural Netw; 2017 Jan; 85():51-68. PubMed ID: 27814466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets.
    Wu Z; Zhu M; Kang Y; Leung EL; Lei T; Shen C; Jiang D; Wang Z; Cao D; Hou T
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33313673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting BRAFV600E mutations in papillary thyroid carcinoma using six machine learning algorithms based on ultrasound elastography.
    Agyekum EA; Wang YG; Xu FJ; Akortia D; Ren YZ; Chambers KH; Wang X; Taupa JO; Qian XQ
    Sci Rep; 2023 Aug; 13(1):12604. PubMed ID: 37537230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing linear discriminant analysis and supervised learning algorithms for binary classification-A method comparison study.
    Graf R; Zeldovich M; Friedrich S
    Biom J; 2024 Jan; 66(1):e2200098. PubMed ID: 36529690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Classification of pulmonary lesion based on multiparametric MRI: utility of radiomics and comparison of machine learning methods.
    Wang X; Wan Q; Chen H; Li Y; Li X
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4595-4605. PubMed ID: 32222795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of machine learning algorithms for chemical toxicity classification using a simulated multi-scale data model.
    Judson R; Elloumi F; Setzer RW; Li Z; Shah I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 9():241. PubMed ID: 18489778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design of Electronic Nose Detection System for Apple Quality Grading Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation and K-Nearest Neighbor Support Vector Machine.
    Zou X; Wang C; Luo M; Ren Q; Liu Y; Zhang S; Bai Y; Meng J; Zhang W; Su SW
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 35458982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A simulation study on missing data imputation for dichotomous variables using statistical and machine learning methods.
    Ge Y; Li Z; Zhang J
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):9432. PubMed ID: 37296269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Study of Classification Algorithms for Various DNA Microarray Data.
    Kim J; Yoon Y; Park HJ; Kim YH
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 35328048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Hand Action Classification Performance Using Machine Learning Based on Signals from Two sEMG Electrodes.
    Shaw HO; Devin KM; Tang J; Jiang L
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Apr; 24(8):. PubMed ID: 38676000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Joint modeling strategy for using electronic medical records data to build machine learning models: an example of intracerebral hemorrhage.
    Tang J; Wang X; Wan H; Lin C; Shao Z; Chang Y; Wang H; Wu Y; Zhang T; Du Y
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Oct; 22(1):278. PubMed ID: 36284327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Machine learning-based monosaccharide profiling for tissue-specific classification of Wolfiporia extensa samples.
    Hsiung SY; Deng SX; Li J; Huang SY; Liaw CK; Huang SY; Wang CC; Hsieh YSY
    Carbohydr Polym; 2023 Dec; 322():121338. PubMed ID: 37839831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Designing a robust feature extraction method based on optimum allocation and principal component analysis for epileptic EEG signal classification.
    Siuly S; Li Y
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Apr; 119(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 25704869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Raman spectroscopy combined with machine learning algorithms for rapid detection Primary Sjögren's syndrome associated with interstitial lung disease.
    Wu X; Chen C; Chen X; Luo C; Lv X; Shi Y; Yang J; Meng X; Chen C; Su J; Wu L
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Dec; 40():103057. PubMed ID: 35944848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrimination of raw and processed Dipsacus asperoides by near infrared spectroscopy combined with least squares-support vector machine and random forests.
    Xin N; Gu XF; Wu H; Hu YZ; Yang ZL
    Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc; 2012 Apr; 89():18-24. PubMed ID: 22240232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resting-State EEG Signal for Major Depressive Disorder Detection: A Systematic Validation on a Large and Diverse Dataset.
    Wu CT; Huang HC; Huang S; Chen IM; Liao SC; Chen CK; Lin C; Lee SH; Chen MH; Tsai CF; Weng CH; Ko LW; Jung TP; Liu YH
    Biosensors (Basel); 2021 Dec; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 34940256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative evaluation of the generalised predictive ability of eight machine learning algorithms across ten clinical metabolomics data sets for binary classification.
    Mendez KM; Reinke SN; Broadhurst DI
    Metabolomics; 2019 Nov; 15(12):150. PubMed ID: 31728648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.