117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24049323)
1. Role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants.
Manikandan A; Sarkar B; Rajendran VT; King PR; Sresty NV; Holla R; Kotur S; Nadendla S
J Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 38(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 24049323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of anatomy-based dwell position and inverse optimization in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer: a dosimetric comparison to a conventional cylindrical dwell position, geometric optimization, and dose-point optimization.
Yoshioka Y; Nishimura T; Kamata M; Harada H; Kanazawa K; Fuji H; Murayama S
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jun; 75(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 15890425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of inverse planning simulated annealing and geometrical optimization for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Hsu IC; Lessard E; Weinberg V; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15533807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of anatomy-based inverse planning with simulated annealing and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Morton GC; Sankreacha R; Halina P; Loblaw A
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 18037356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraoperative optimization of needle placement and dwell times for conformal prostate brachytherapy.
Edmundson GK; Yan D; Martinez AA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1257-63. PubMed ID: 7493850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does inverse planning improve plan quality in interstitial high-dose-rate breast brachytherapy?
Major T; Fröhlich G; Mészáros N; Smanykó V; Polgár C
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2020 Apr; 12(2):166-174. PubMed ID: 32395141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of dwell time homogeneity error weight parameter on treatment plan quality in inverse optimized high-dose-rate cervix brachytherapy using SagiPlan.
Mosleh-Shirazi MA; Shahcheraghi-Motlagh E; Gholami MH; Shakibafard A; Karbasi S; Fardid R
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2019 Jun; 11(3):256-266. PubMed ID: 31435433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric comparison of various optimization techniques for high dose rate brachytherapy of interstitial cervix implants.
Shwetha B; Ravikumar M; Katke A; Supe SS; Venkatagiri G; Ramanand N; Pasha T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 11(3):3227. PubMed ID: 20717091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tandem-ring dwell time ratio in Nigeria: dose comparisons of two loading patterns in standard high-dose-rate brachytherapy planning for cervical cancer.
Ibhade OR; Oyeyemi OE; Idayat AB; Atara I N
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2015 Apr; 7(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 26034498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early clinical experience with anatomy-based inverse planning dose optimization for high-dose-rate boost of the prostate.
Lachance B; Béliveau-Nadeau D; Lessard E; Chrétien M; Hsu IC; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L; Vigneault E
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Sep; 54(1):86-100. PubMed ID: 12182978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of activating source dwell positions outside the CTV on the dose to treated normal tissue volumes in TRUS guided 3D conformal interstitial HDR brachytherapy of prostate cancer.
Karlsson L; Thunberg P; Johansson B; Persliden J
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2014 Oct; 6(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 25337130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving the dosimetric coverage of interstitial high-dose-rate breast implants.
Kestin LL; Jaffray DA; Edmundson GK; Martinez AA; Wong JW; Kini VR; Chen PY; Vicini FA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jan; 46(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 10656370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiobiological evaluation of the influence of dwell time modulation restriction in HIPO optimized HDR prostate brachytherapy implants.
Mavroidis P; Katsilieri Z; Kefala V; Milickovic N; Papanikolaou N; Karabis A; Zamboglou N; Baltas D
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2010 Sep; 2(3):117-128. PubMed ID: 27853473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inverse planning for interstitial gynecologic template brachytherapy: truly anatomy-based planning.
Lessard E; Hsu IC; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Nov; 54(4):1243-51. PubMed ID: 12419454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraoperative real-time planned conformal prostate brachytherapy: post-implantation dosimetric outcome and clinical implications.
Zelefsky MJ; Yamada Y; Cohen GN; Sharma N; Shippy AM; Fridman D; Zaider M
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Aug; 84(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 17692978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dwell time modulation restrictions do not necessarily improve treatment plan quality for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Balvert M; Gorissen BL; den Hertog D; Hoffmann AL
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(2):537-48. PubMed ID: 25549084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric comparison of inverse optimization with geometric optimization in combination with graphical optimization for HDR prostate implants.
Jamema SV; Saju S; Shetty UM; Pallad S; Deshpande DD; Shrivastava SK
J Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 31(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 21206671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Panettieri V; Smith RL; Mason NJ; Millar JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):5055. PubMed ID: 25493531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The evaluation of a 2D diode array in "magic phantom" for use in high dose rate brachytherapy pretreatment quality assurance.
Espinoza A; Petasecca M; Fuduli I; Howie A; Bucci J; Corde S; Jackson M; Lerch ML; Rosenfeld AB
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):663-673. PubMed ID: 28102606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of the dwell time deviation constraint (DTDC) parameter on dosimetry with IPSA optimisation for HDR prostate brachytherapy.
Smith RL; Panettieri V; Lancaster C; Mason N; Franich RD; Millar JL
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Mar; 38(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 25481387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
